Evidence mapPaperPMID 35601027Full record

ArticleStatistics in biopharmaceutical research2022

Efficient Multiple Imputation for Sensitivity Analysis of Recurrent Events Data with Informative Censoring.

Guoqing Diao, Guanghan F Liu, Donglin Zeng, Yilong Zhang, Gregory Golm, Joseph F Heyse, Joseph G Ibrahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biopharmaceutical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guoqing DiaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, U.S.A.
Guanghan F LiuMerck & Co., Inc., North Wales, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Yilong ZhangMerck & Co., Inc., North Wales, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Gregory GolmMerck & Co., Inc., North Wales, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Joseph F HeyseMerck & Co., Inc., North Wales, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Joseph G IbrahimDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Funding

Bayesian Approaches to Model Selection for Survival DataR01GM070335 · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · 2003 to 2005
$591k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missing data are commonly encountered in clinical trials due to dropout or nonadherence to study procedures. In trials in which recurrent events are of interest, the observed count can be an undercount of the events if a patient drops out before the end of the study. In many applications, the data are not necessarily missing at random and it is often not possible to test the missing at random assumption. Consequently, it is critical to conduct sensitivity analysis. We develop a control-based multiple imputation method for recurrent events data, where patients who drop out of the study are assumed to have a similar response profile to those in the control group after dropping out. Specifically, we consider the copy reference approach and the jump to reference approach. We model the recurrent event data using a semiparametric proportional intensity frailty model with the baseline hazard function completely unspecified. We develop nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation and inference procedures. We then impute the missing data based on the large sample distribution of the resulting estimators. The variance estimation is corrected by a bootstrap procedure. Simulation studies demonstrate the proposed method performs well in practical settings. We provide applications to two clinical trials.

Indexed as

bootstrap methodclinical trialsmissing datanonparametric maximum likelihood estimation

Identifiers

PMID35601027
PMCPMC9119645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.