ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2022
Predictive Model for Heart Failure Readmission Using Nationwide Readmissions Database.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Characteristics of Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Models Considering Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Pooled it
- Heart failure readmissions in urban and rural hospital settings: An analysis of 30-day readmissions using the 2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- The Narrative Review: Advancements in Heart Failure Diagnosis and Management using Artificial Intelligence: A New Era of Patient Care.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Leveraging environmental information for enhanced prediction of cardiac readmissions.iScience · 2025Article
- Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Construction and evaluation of a 180-day readmission prediction model for chronic heart failure patients based on sCD40L.Medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing Clinical Decision Making by Predicting Readmission Risk in Patients With Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: Predictive Model Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based readmission risk prediction model for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Predicting Six-Month Re-Admission Risk in Heart Failure Patients Using Multiple Machine Learning Methods: A Study Based on the Chinese Heart Failure Population Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Identification of High-Risk Patients for Postoperative Myocardial Injury After CME Using Machine Learning: A 10-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Predicting readmission rates in critically ill heart failure patients during a 90-day vulnerable phase using interpretable machine learning models.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To generate a heart failure (HF) readmission prediction model using the Nationwide Readmissions Database to guide management and reduce HF readmissions. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients listed for HF admissions in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. A Cox proportional hazards model for sample survey data for the prediction of readmission for all patients with HF was implemented using a derivation cohort (2010-2012). We generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and estimated area under the ROC curve at each time point (30, 60, 90, and 180 days) to assess the accuracy of our predictive model using the derivation cohort (2010-2012) and compared it with the validation cohort (2013-2014). A risk score was computed for the validation cohort. On the basis of the total risk score, we calculated the probability of readmission at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days. Results: Approximately 1,420,564 patients were admitted for HF, contributing to 1,817,735 total HF admissions. Of these, 665,867 patients had at least 1 readmission for HF. The 10 most common comorbidities for readmitted patients included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, chronic pulmonary disease, deficiency anemia, fluid and electrolyte disorders, obesity, hypothyroidism, peripheral vascular disorders, and depression. The area under the ROC curve for the prediction model was 0.58 in the derivation cohort and 0.59 in the validation cohort. Conclusion: The prediction model will find clinical utility at point of care in optimizing the management of patients with HF and reducing HF readmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.