ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2022
Functional outcome of arthroscopic debridement for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears.
Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histologic and biomechanical comparison of fascia lata autograft, acellular dermal xenograft, and synthetic patch for bridging massive rotator cuff tear in a rabbit model.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2024Article
- Superior capsular reconstruction using hybrid graft for irreparable massive rotator cuff tear.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain in the middle-aged population. The treatment of these lesions must be individualized on the basis of the type of patient, the clinical and anatomical picture. Arthroscopic debridement is indicated in painful massive tears, in the absence of severe functional impairment of the shoulder. The aim of this study is the evaluation of the medium term clinical results of this procedure. We retrospectively assessed patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement surgery for massive rotator cuff injury in the period between January 2011 and December 2016 at our institution. A group of patients underwent a follow-up evaluation during which the Constant Score, Oxford Shoulder Score and NRS pain score were compiled. Those who were unable to attend the evaluation were assessed through a telephone questionnaire aimed at investigating pain and degree of satisfaction with the treatment. 93% of patients were satisfied with the results obtained, with an average NRS of 1.31 for patients undergoing the medical examination and 0.68 for patients contacted by telephone. The mean Constant score of the evaluated patients was 75.6 ± sd, with a mean strength of 3.92 ± sd, while the mean value of the Oxford Shoulder Score was 16.8 ± sd. The study suggests that arthroscopic debridement is a viable option for the surgical treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. The clinical results and patient satisfaction are conditioned by the preoperative functional status: an optimal outcome can be expected for painful shoulders with sufficiently preserved active mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.