Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35607868›Full record

SynthesisTrauma, violence & abuse2023

Methodological and Ethical Implications of Using Remote Data Collection Tools to Measure Sexual and Reproductive Health and Gender-Based Violence Outcomes among Women and Girls in Humanitarian and Fragile Settings: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Research.

Luissa Vahedi, Najat Qushua, Ilana Seff, Michelle Doering, Carrie Stoll, Susan A Bartels, Lindsay Stark

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luissa VahediBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7112-3348
Najat QushuaBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ilana SeffBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2569-995X
Michelle DoeringBecker Medical Library, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Carrie StollWashington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Susan A BartelsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston ON, Canada.
Lindsay StarkBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8775-9735
Washington University in St. Louis · USQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Gender-Based ViolenceReproductive Health ServicesFemaleHumansReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorSurveys and Questionnairesethicsfragile settinggender based violencehumanitarian settingmeasurementremote data collectionsexual reproductive healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35607868
PMCPMC10486180
OpenAlexW4281401262

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.