ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebrospinal fluid flow within ventricles and subarachnoid space evaluated by velocity selective spin labeling MRI.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Altered cerebral oxygen extraction and metabolism in preterm neonates and the relationship to anemia: A noncontrast MRI study.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2024Article
- Direct angiographic comparison of different velocity-selective saturation, inversion, and DANTE labeling modules on cerebral arteries.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Test-retest reliability of 3D velocity-selective arterial spin labeling for detecting normal variations of cerebral blood flow.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Velocity-selective arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI: A review of the state of the art and recommendations for clinical implementation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Review
- TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Anatomy imaging and hemodynamics research on the cerebral vein and venous sinus among individuals without cranial sinus and jugular vein diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a T
methodsThe venous isolation preparation was achieved by using an FT-VS inversion plus a nonselective inversion (NSI) pulse to null the arterial blood signal while minimally affected capillary blood flows out into the venular vasculature during the outflow time (TO), and then applying an Fourier transform based velocity selective saturation (FT-VSS) pulse to suppress the tissue signal. A multi-echo readout was employed to obtain venous T
resultsThe FT-VS-based methods yielded higher venous blood signal and temporal SNR with less CSF contamination than the velocity-selective saturation-based results. The averaged Y
conclusionThe feasibility of the FT-VS-based Y
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.