ArticleBritish journal of cancer2022
Family history, obesity, urological factors and diabetic medications and their associations with risk of prostate cancer diagnosis in a large prospective study.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of metformin on incidence, recurrence, and mortality in prostate cancer patients: integrating evidence from real-world studies.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiometabolic risk and metabolic syndrome with prostate cancer-an inverse probability weighted study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Obesity, metformin prescription and risk of advanced prostate cancer in non-diabetic men.BJC reports · 2026Article
- Is targeted biopsy necessary for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 lesions?Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Novel ELISA-Based Biomarkers: Insights into Inflammatory and Tumor-Specific Pathways.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Does metformin really reduce prostate cancer risk: an up-to-date comprehensive genome-wide analysis.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2024Article
- General Obesity and Prostate Cancer in Relation to Abdominal Obesity and Ethnic Groups: A US Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Research and reports in urology · 2024Article
- Cribiform and intraductal carcinoma in hereditary prostate cancer: clinical and pathological analysis of 20 cases.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PC) aetiology is unclear. PC risk was examined in relation to several factors in a large population-based prospective study.
methodsMale participants were from Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study (Australia) recruited between 2006 and 2009. Questionnaire and linked administrative health data from the Centre for Health Record Linkage and Services Australia were used to identify incident PC, healthcare utilisations, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing reimbursements and dispensing of metformin and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) prescriptions. Multivariable Cox and Joint Cox regression analyses were used to examine associations by cancer spread, adjusting for various confounders.
resultsOf 107,706 eligible men, 4257 developed incident PC up to end 2013. Risk of PC diagnosis increased with: PC family history (versus no family history of cancer; HR
conclusionVasectomy and obesity are associated with an increased risk of advanced PC. The reduced risk of localised and advanced PC associated with BPH, and diabetes prescriptions warrants investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.