Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611607›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2022

General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY-Q.

Farima Dalaei, Claire E E de Vries, Lotte Poulsen, Manraj N Kaur, André Pfob, Danny Mou, Amalie L Jacobsen, Jussi P Repo, Rosa Salzillo, Jakub Opyrchal and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anterior Aesthetic Rib Cage Remodeling With Osteosynthesis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Farima DalaeiResearch Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2305-7758
Claire E E de VriesDepartment of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8885-9546
Lotte PoulsenResearch Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-806X
Manraj N KaurBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-0395
André PfobUniversity Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-9895
Danny MouDepartment of General Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3563
Amalie L JacobsenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-4523
Jussi P RepoUnit of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-5698
Rosa SalzilloDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1596-5919
Jakub OpyrchalDepartment of Plastic Surgery, T. Marciniaka Specialized Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland.
Anne F KlassenDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4720-0096
Jens Ahm SørensenResearch Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-0094
Andrea L PusicDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research Fellowship Award 2020-23Odense Universitetshospital A5006The Region of Southern Denmark 21/17592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY-Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine normative values for the BODY-Q. Participants were recruited internationally through two crowdsourcing platforms. The participants were invited to complete the BODY-Q scales through an URL link provided within the crowdsourcing platforms. General linear analyses were performed to compare normative means between countries and continents adjusted for relevant covariates. Normative reference values were stratified by age, body mass index (BMI), and gender. The BODY-Q was completed by 4051 (2052 North American and 1999 European) participants. The mean age was 36 years (±14.7 SD) and ranged from 17 to 76 years, the mean BMI was 26.4 (±6.7 SD) kg/m

Indexed as

Body ContouringPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresWeight LossAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeReference ValuesYoung Adultbariatric surgerybody contouringgeneral population normsnormative scorespatient-reported outcome measurepatient-reported outcomesquality of lifeweight loss surgery

Identifiers

PMID35611607
PMCPMC9541838

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.