ArticleAvicenna journal of phytomedicine
Fraction from
Article in Avicenna journal of phytomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Bisdemethoxycurcumin chemoprevents 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary toxicity via modulation of oxidative processes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nigerian medicinal plants with potential anticancer activity-a review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Materials and Methods: Female Wistar rats (40) were allotted into five equal groups. Group 1 served as control, group 2 received DMBA (50 mg/kg), groups 3 and 4 received DMBA and were treated with CP at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg respectively, and the group 5 received DMBA and vincristine (0.5 mg/kg). DMBA was injected intraperitoneally once while vincristine and CP were given twice and thrice per week, respectively. Results: Administration ofDMBA caused a significant decrease in body weight gain by 52%. In addition, DMBA significantly increased organo-somatic weight of mammary gland by 4.0 folds. Also, DMBA significantly increased inflammatory and oxidative stress markers serum interleukin-1β (IL-1β), lipid peroxidation (LPO) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) by 27, 18 and 435%, respectively. Similarly, mammary NO (nitric oxide) and LPO were increased by 468 and 21%, respectively. In contrast, DMBA decreased the levels of apoptotic markers BAX, caspases 3 and 9 by 20, 15 and 18%, and mammary superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione-s-peroxidase (GPx) by 45, 51 and 68%, respectively. Histology revealed gland with malignant epithelial cells and high nucleo-cytoplasm in DMBA-administered rats. Treatment with CP 100 mg/kg decreased LPO, MPO, IL-1β and NO by 28, 35, 78 and 85%, respectively, and ameliorated DMBA-induced cyto-architectural anomalies. Conclusion: Fraction of CP protects mammary gland from DMBA insults via antioxidative and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.