ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022
Cognitive and Experienced Flexibility in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Naturalistic Associations Between Childhood Maltreatment, Compulsivity, and Eating Disorder Symptoms Over a 12-Months Period Among Individuals With Anorexia Nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Article
- Abrupt onset or exacerbation of anorexia nervosa following recent infections: a mini-review and a case report with an atypical manifestation of PANS.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2025Review
- Investigating self-report and neuropsychological assessments of cognitive flexibility in people with and without persistent pain: An online, cross-sectional, observational study.British journal of pain · 2024Article
- Idiopathic basal ganglia calcification presenting with obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A case report.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024Article
- Remediating cognitive inflexibility in obsessive compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa neither moderates nor mediates treatment effects: an exploratory study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Association of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-17 levels with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a case-control study findings.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Habits and Persistent Food Restriction in Patients with Anorexia Nervosa: A Scoping Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Conflation between self-report and neurocognitive assessments of cognitive flexibility: a critical review of the Jingle Fallacy.Australian journal of psychology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) share a neuropsychological profile characterized by cognitive inflexibility as evident in set-shifting problems, and by strong detail focus. Clinically, both patient groups display a strong rigidity which may be explained by these neurocognitive difficulties. Cognitive inflexibility may hinder treatment uptake and help explain suboptimal treatment outcomes in both AN and OCD. This is the first study to compare clinical AN and OCD groups andto examine similarities and differences in cognitive flexibility. Specifically, this study aims to investigate neuropsychological outcomes and self-reported difficulties in both clinical groups and a control group, and explore associations between the different flexibility outcomes and illness. Method: Two hundred participants (61 AN, 72 OCD and 67 HC) performed neuropsychological tasks on set-shifting abilities (Trail Making Task, Stroop color-word interference, Intradimensional-Extradimensional shift task), detail focus (Group Embedded Figures Test) and self-reported set-shifting abilities and attention to detail (DFlex). Results: Similarities between patient groups were found in terms of reduced set-shifting ability on the Trail Making Task and detail focus. Moreover, both patient groups self-reported more set-shifting problems but a less strong detail focus than HC, which in turn were not related to neuropsychological task outcomes in either of the groups. In both patient groups longer illness duration was associated to longer reaction times in the switching tasks and for both groups symptom severity was associated to higher experienced inflexibility and attention to detail. Conclusion: Cognitive inflexibility processes are largely similar in patients with AN and OCD. Both patient groups report inflexibility, yet this is unrelated to neuropsychological outcomes. Illness duration seems to contribute to poorer set-shifting and higher illness severity is linked to more experienced inflexibility. Findings highlight the need for entangling different domains of cognitive flexibility and detail focus and examining self-report measures for a cohesive understanding of clinically relevant flexibility weaknesses in AN and OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.