Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619544›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Investigating the Interactions of Glioma Stem Cells in the Perivascular Niche at Single-Cell Resolution using a Microfluidic Tumor Microenvironment Model.

Emmanuela A Adjei-Sowah, Samantha A O'Connor, Jaimeson Veldhuizen, Costanza Lo Cascio, Christopher Plaisier, Shwetal Mehta, Mehdi Nikkhah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Microfabricated Organ-Specific Models of Tumor Microenvironments.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuela A Adjei-SowahSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-9709, USA.
Samantha A O'ConnorSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-9709, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8202-2435
Jaimeson VeldhuizenSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-9709, USA.
Costanza Lo CascioIvy Brain Tumor Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Christopher PlaisierSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-9709, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3273-5717
Shwetal MehtaIvy Brain Tumor Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Mehdi NikkhahSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-9709, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5970-7666
Arizona State University · USBarrow Neurological Institute · US

Funding

Defining cellular states of quiescence in human brain tumorsR01NS119650 · NINDS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PADDISON, PATRICK · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Elucidating the Role of Perivascular Niche in Glioblastoma Invasion and Therapeutic Resistance at Single Cell Resolution using Biomimetic Tumor Microenvironment ModelsR01NS123038 · NINDS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI NIKKHAH, MEHDI · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119650NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perivascular niche (PVN) is a glioblastoma tumor microenvironment (TME) that serves as a safe haven for glioma stem cells (GSCs), and acts as a reservoir that inevitably leads to tumor recurrence. Understanding cellular interactions in the PVN that drive GSC treatment resistance and stemness is crucial to develop lasting therapies for glioblastoma. The limitations of in vivo models and in vitro assays have led to critical knowledge gaps regarding the influence of various cell types in the PVN on GSCs behavior. This study developed an organotypic triculture microfluidic model as a means to recapitulate the PVN and study its impact on GSCs. This triculture platform, comprised of endothelial cells (ECs), astrocytes, and GSCs, is used to investigate GSC invasion, proliferation and stemness. Both ECs and astrocytes significantly increased invasiveness of GSCs. This study futher identified 15 ligand-receptor pairs using single-cell RNAseq with putative chemotactic mechanisms of GSCs, where the receptor is up-regulated in GSCs and the diffusible ligand is expressed in either astrocytes or ECs. Notably, the ligand-receptor pair SAA1-FPR1 is demonstrated to be involved in chemotactic invasion of GSCs toward PVN. The novel triculture platform presented herein can be used for therapeutic development and discovery of molecular mechanisms driving GSC biology.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaEndothelial CellsHumansLigandsMicrofluidicsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentLigandsglioblastomainvasionperivascular nichetranscriptomicstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35619544
PMCPMC9313491
OpenAlexW4281764764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.