Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35622889›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Two light sensors decode moonlight versus sunlight to adjust a plastic circadian/circalunidian clock to moon phase.

Martin Zurl, Birgit Poehn, Dirk Rieger, Shruthi Krishnan, Dunja Rokvic, Vinoth Babu Veedin Rajan, Elliot Gerrard, Matthias Schlichting, Lukas Orel, Aida Ćorić and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Photoreceptor control ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A structural decryption of cryptochromes.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Martin ZurlMax Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8880-2491
Birgit PoehnMax Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Dirk RiegerDepartment for Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri Institute, Biocentre, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5597-5858
Shruthi KrishnanInstitute of Molecular Biology, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Dunja RokvicMax Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Vinoth Babu Veedin RajanMax Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2430-7395
Elliot GerrardDivision of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom.
Matthias SchlichtingHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454.ORCID 0000-0002-0822-0265
Lukas OrelMax Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6999-5833
Aida ĆorićMax Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Robert J LucasDivision of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1088-8029
Eva WolfInstitute of Molecular Biology, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1345-6114
Charlotte Helfrich-FörsterDepartment for Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri Institute, Biocentre, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0859-9092
Florian RaibleMax Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4515-6485
Kristin Tessmar-RaibleMax Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8038-1741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many species synchronize their physiology and behavior to specific hours. It is commonly assumed that sunlight acts as the main entrainment signal for ∼24-h clocks. However, the moon provides similarly regular time information. Consistently, a growing number of studies have reported correlations between diel behavior and lunidian cycles. Yet, mechanistic insight into the possible influences of the moon on ∼24-h timers remains scarce. We have explored the marine bristleworm Platynereis dumerilii to investigate the role of moonlight in the timing of daily behavior. We uncover that moonlight, besides its role in monthly timing, also schedules the exact hour of nocturnal swarming onset to the nights’ darkest times. Our work reveals that extended moonlight impacts on a plastic clock that exhibits <24 h (moonlit) or >24 h (no moon) periodicity. Abundance, light sensitivity, and genetic requirement indicate that the Platynereis light receptor molecule r-Opsin1 serves as a receptor that senses moonrise, whereas the cryptochrome protein L-Cry is required to discriminate the proper valence of nocturnal light as either moonlight or sunlight. Comparative experiments in Drosophila suggest that cryptochrome’s principle requirement for light valence interpretation is conserved. Its exact biochemical properties differ, however, between species with dissimilar timing ecology. Our work advances the molecular understanding of lunar impact on fundamental rhythmic processes, including those of marine mass spawners endangered by anthropogenic change.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksCircadian RhythmMoonPolychaetaAnimalsCryptochromesDrosophila melanogasterRod OpsinsSunlightCryptochromeslong-wavelength opsinRod Opsinschronobiologymarine biologymolecular clockmoon lightreproduction

Identifiers

PMID35622889
PMCPMC9295771

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.