ArticleJournal of athletic training2023
A Descriptive Analysis of Patient Outcomes and Experiences at a Student-Run Athletic Training Clinic.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe prevalence of student-run clinics is rising due to educational benefits and the ability to provide cost-effective care to underserved patients. Current literature on the effect of athletic training student-run clinics on patient outcomes and experiences is limited.
objectiveTo explore patient-reported outcomes (PROs), patient experiences, and patient demographics in an athletic training student-run clinic.
designMixed-methods study: cross-sectional survey with retrospective analysis of deidentified patient outcomes from November 2017-October 2021.
settingAthletic training student-run clinic. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participantsA total of 388 patients from the university (ie, students and staff) and local community with a variety of musculoskeletal injuries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants completed a packet to provide their responses to demographic items and PRO scales: Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, and Global Rating of Change Scale at 3 time points. They also completed an electronic patient experience survey after their final visit to the student-run clinic.
resultsMost participants reported clinically significant improvements across all PRO scales: an average improvement of 39.1% in pain, 39.3% in function, and 43.1% in quality of life in <11 days, on average. Furthermore, they described a high level of satisfaction with care and a globally positive experience at the student-run clinic.
conclusionsPatients experienced clinically significant improvements in pain, function, disablement, and quality of life when receiving care from athletic training students at a student-run clinic. In addition, they indicated a high level of satisfaction with the care provided and a positive overall experience with an athletic training student-run clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.