Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624750›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Vascular Niche for Adult Cardiac Progenitor Cells.

Diego Herrero, Guillermo Albericio, Marina Higuera, María Herranz-López, Miguel A García-Brenes, Alejandra Cordero, Enrique Roche, Pilar Sepúlveda, Carmen Mora, Antonio Bernad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Autophagy as a Guardian of Vascular Niche Homeostasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Development of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Unravelling the Interplay between Cardiac Metabolism and Heart Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diego HerreroDepartment of Immunology & Oncology, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo AlbericioDepartment of Immunology & Oncology, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0190-4848
Marina HigueraDepartment of Immunology & Oncology, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
María Herranz-LópezInstitute of Research, Development and Innovation in Health Biotechnology of Elche (IDiBE), Universitas Miguel Hernández (UMH), 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1819-7978
Miguel A García-BrenesDepartment of Immunology & Oncology, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Alejandra CorderoDepartment of Immunology & Oncology, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Enrique RocheInstitute of Bioengineering and Department of Applied Biology-Nutrition, Miguel Hernández University, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5128-1672
Pilar SepúlvedaRegenerative Medicine and Heart Transplantation Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Avda, Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6071-7431
Carmen MoraDepartment of Immunology & Oncology, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6071-7132
Antonio BernadDepartment of Immunology & Oncology, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Centro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III RETICS-RTI2018-097604-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on cardiac progenitor cell populations has generated expectations about their potential for cardiac regeneration capacity after acute myocardial infarction and during physiological aging; however, the endogenous capacity of the adult mammalian heart is limited. The modest efficacy of exogenous cell-based treatments can guide the development of new approaches that, alone or in combination, can be applied to boost clinical efficacy. The identification and manipulation of the adult stem cell environment, termed niche, will be critical for providing new evidence on adult stem cell populations and improving stem-cell-based therapies. Here, we review and discuss the state of our understanding of the interaction of adult cardiac progenitor cells with other cardiac cell populations, with a focus on the description of the B-CPC progenitor population (Bmi1+ cardiac progenitor cell), which is a strong candidate progenitor for all main cardiac cell lineages, both in the steady state and after cardiac damage. The set of all interactions should be able to define the vascular cardiac stem cell niche, which is associated with low oxidative stress domains in vasculature, and whose manipulation would offer new hope in the cardiac regeneration field.

Indexed as

Bmi1cardiac progenitorcardiac turnoverendothelial cellheartnichepolycombROSstem cellvascular niche

Identifiers

PMID35624750
PMCPMC9137669
OpenAlexW4225162789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.