Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626403›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Development of a Deep Learning Model for Malignant Small Bowel Tumors Survival: A SEER-Based Study.

Minyue Yin, Jiaxi Lin, Lu Liu, Jingwen Gao, Wei Xu, Chenyan Yu, Shuting Qu, Xiaolin Liu, Lijuan Qian, Chunfang Xu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minyue YinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-5744
Jiaxi LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Lu LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Jingwen GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Wei XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Chenyan YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Shuting QuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Xiaolin LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Lijuan QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Chunfang XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Jinzhou ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Plan of Suzhou City SKY2021038Youth Program of Suzhou Health Committee KJXW2019001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This study aims to explore a deep learning (DL) algorithm for developing a prognostic model and perform survival analyses in SBT patients. Methods The demographic and clinical features of patients with SBTs were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We randomly split the samples into the training set and the validation set at 7:3. Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) analysis and the DeepSurv algorithm were used to develop models. The performance of the Cox-PH and DeepSurv models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, C-statistics and decision-curve analysis (DCA). A Kaplan−Meier (K−M) survival analysis was performed for further explanation on prognostic effect of the Cox-PH model. Results The multivariate analysis demonstrated that seven variables were associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) (all p < 0.05). The DeepSurv model showed better performance than the Cox-PH model (C-index: 0.871 vs. 0.866). The calibration curves and DCA revealed that the two models had good discrimination and calibration. Moreover, patients with ileac malignancy and N2 stage disease were not responding to surgery according to the K−M analysis. Conclusions This study reported a DeepSurv model that performed well in CSS in SBT patients. It might offer insights into future research to explore more DL algorithms in cohort studies.

Indexed as

Cox proportional hazardsDeepSurvSEER databasesmall bowel tumorssurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID35626403
PMCPMC9141623
OpenAlexW4280630103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.