Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35632702›Full record

ReviewViruses2022

Herpesvirus Replication Compartments: Dynamic Biomolecular Condensates?

Enrico Caragliano, Wolfram Brune, Jens B Bosse

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Nuclear speckles are regulatory hubs for viral and host mRNA expression during HSV-1 infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Vital for Viruses: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Journal of molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enrico CaraglianoLeibniz Institute for Experimental Virology (HPI), 20251 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2193-1851
Wolfram BruneLeibniz Institute for Experimental Virology (HPI), 20251 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-5255
Jens B BosseLeibniz Institute for Experimental Virology (HPI), 20251 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7252-5541
Leibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209250/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent progress has provided clear evidence that many RNA-viruses form cytoplasmic biomolecular condensates mediated by liquid-liquid phase separation to facilitate their replication. In contrast, seemingly contradictory data exist for herpesviruses, which replicate their DNA genomes in nuclear membrane-less replication compartments (RCs). Here, we review the current literature and comment on nuclear condensate formation by herpesviruses, specifically with regard to RC formation. Based on data obtained with human cytomegalovirus (human herpesvirus 5), we propose that liquid and homogenous early RCs convert into more heterogeneous RCs with complex properties over the course of infection. We highlight how the advent of DNA replication leads to the maturation of these biomolecular condensates, likely by adding an additional DNA scaffold.

Indexed as

Biomolecular CondensatesSimplexvirusCell NucleusCytoplasmHumansViral Replication Compartmentsbiomolecular condensateCMVherpesvirusliquid–liquid phase separationmaturationreplication compartment

Identifiers

PMID35632702
PMCPMC9147375
OpenAlexW4225396436

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.