ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2022
Internal Carotid Artery Angle Variations are Poorly Explained by Vascular Risk Factors: The Northern Manhattan Study.
Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe internal carotid artery (ICA) angle of origin may contribute to atherogenesis by altered hemodynamics. We aim to determine the contribution of vascular risk factors and arterial wall changes to ICA angle variations.
methodsWe analyzed 1,065 stroke-free participants from the population-based Northern Manhattan Study who underwent B-mode ultrasound (mean age 68.7±8.9 years; 59% women). ICA angle was estimated at the intersection between the common carotid artery and the ICA center line projections. Narrower external angles translating into greater carotid bifurcation bending were considered unfavorable. Linear regression models were fitted to assess the relationship between ICA angle and demographics, vascular risk factors, and arterial wall changes including carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and plaque presence.
resultsICA angles were narrower on the left compared to the right side (153±15.4 degrees versus 161.4±12.7 degrees, p<0.01). Mean cIMT was 0.9±0.1 mm and 54.3% had at least one plaque. ICA angle was not associated with cIMT or plaque presence. Unfavorable left and right ICA angles were associated with advanced age (per 10-year increase β=-1.6; p=0.01, and -1.3; p=0.03, respectively) and being Black participant (β=-4.6; p<0.01 and -2.9; p=0.04, respectively), while unfavorable left ICA angle was associated with being female (β=-2.8; p=0.03) and increased diastolic blood pressure (per 10 mmHg increase β=-2.1; p<0.01). Overall, studied factors explained less than 10% of the variance in ICA angle (left R
conclusionOnly a small portion of ICA angle variation were explained by demographics, vascular risk factors and arterial wall changes. Whether ICA angle is determined by other environmental or genetic factors, and is an independent risk factor for atherogenesis, requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.