Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635048›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine2022

Role of silymarin as antioxidant in clinical management of chronic liver diseases: a narrative review.

Alessio Aghemo, Olga P Alekseeva, Francesco Angelico, Igor G Bakulin, Natalia V Bakulina, Dmitry Bordin, Alexey O Bueverov, Oxana M Drapkina, Anton Gillessen, Elvira M Kagarmanova and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05497765 (Effects of Compound Silymarin on Biomarkers of Lipid Metabolism and Inflammation in Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05497765 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Compound Silymarin on Biomarkers of Lipid Metabolism and Inflammation in Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuangzhou Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled94ConditionsNonalcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseArmsSilibinin extract, mixed power of pueraria, schisandra and salvia miltiorrhiza, Silibinin extract, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antidiabetic Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mechanistic Elucidation ofJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  14. Evaluation of Nutraceutical Potential ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Liver disorders and phytotherapy.Toxicology reports · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

Alessio AghemoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Olga P AlekseevaGastroenterological Center, Semashko National Research University, Moscow, Russia.
Francesco AngelicoSapienza School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Igor G BakulinDepartment of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases, Federal State Medical University of Ministry of Health of Russia, Chief Specialist-Therapist of the North-Western Federal district, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia V BakulinaDepartment of Therapy and Clinical Pharmacology, North-Western State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry BordinDepartment of Pancreatic, Biliary, and Upper Digestive Tract Disorders, A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey O BueverovDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Moscow Medical Academy, Moscow, Russia.
Oxana M DrapkinaMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation, Chief Specialist of Therapy and General Practice Ministry of Health of Russia, Grozny, Russia.
Anton GillessenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Herz-Jesu-Hospital, Muenster, Germany.
Elvira M KagarmanovaGastroenterological Department, GBUZ RB City clinical Hospital, Sterlitamak, Russia.
Natalia V KorochanskayaGastroenterology Center, Regional Clinical Hospital, Tyumen, Russia.
U A KucheryaviiDepartment of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.
Leonid B LazebnikDepartment of Polyclinic Therapy, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.
Maria A LivzanDepartment of Faculty Therapy, Omsk State Medical University, Omsk, Russia.
Igor V MaevDepartment of Propedeutics of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.
Anatolii I MartynovDepartment of Internal Diseases, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.
Marina F OsipenkoDepartment for Science, Innovations and Informatization, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Evgenii I Sas2nd Department of Therapy, Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Antonina StarodubovaDepartment of Scientific and Clinical Work, INSTITUTE "Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnologies", Moscow, Russia.
Yurii P UspenskyDepartment of faculty therapy, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University (Spbpgmu) of the RF MOH, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Elena V VinnitskayaDepartment of Hepatology, Moscow Clinical Research and Practice Center, Moscow, Russia.
Emilia P YakovenkoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Education of the Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey A YakovlevDepartment of gastroenterology and endoscopy, Rostov State Medical, Rostov, Russia.
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center · RUAcademy of Medical Sciences · GBCity Clinical Hospital · RUFederal Ministry of Health · NGFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology · RUIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITJesus University · KRMinistry of Defense · ILMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUMoscow Aviation Institute · RUMoscow State University · TJMoscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry · RUNorth-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov · RUNovosibirsk State Medical University · RUOmsk State Medical University · RUPirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RURostov State Medical University · RUSaint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University · RUState University of Management · RUSt. Petersburg State Medical Academy "City Polyclinic №44" · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic liver disease (CLD), manifested as hepatic injury, is a major cause of global morbidity and mortality. CLD progresses to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and-ultimately-hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) if left untreated. The different phenotypes of CLD based on their respective clinical features and causative agents include alcoholic liver disease (ALD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), and drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The preferred treatment modality for CLD includes lifestyle modification and diet, along with limited pharmacological agents for symptomatic treatment. Moreover, oxidative stress (OS) is an important pathological mechanism underlying all CLD phenotypes; hence, the use of antioxidants to manage the disease is justified. Based on available clinical evidence, silymarin can be utilized as a hepatoprotective agent, given its potent antioxidant, antifibrotic, and anti-inflammatory properties. The role of silymarin in suppressing OS has been well established, and therefore silymarin is recommended for use in ALD and NAFLD in the guidelines approved by the Russian Medical Scientific Society of Therapists and the Gastroenterology Scientific Society of Russia. However, to discuss the positioning of the original silymarin in clinical guidelines and treatment protocols as a hepatoprotective agent for managing CLD concomitantly with other therapies, an expert panel of international and Russian medical professionals was convened on 11 November 2020. The panel reviewed approaches for the prevention and treatment of OS, existing guidelines for patient management for CLD, and available evidence on the effectiveness of silymarin in reducing OS, fibrosis, and hepatic inflammation and presented in the form of a narrative review. Key messagesAn expert panel of international and Russian medical professionals reviewed existing guidelines for ALD, NAFLD, MAFLD, and DILI to establish consensus recommendations that oxidative stress is the common pathophysiological mechanism underlying these conditions.The panel also discussed the positioning of original silymarin in clinical guidelines and treatment protocols as a hepatoprotective agent for managing CLD concomitantly with other therapies.The panel reviewed the effectiveness of 140 mg original silymarin three times a day in reducing oxidative stress in chronic liver diseases such as ALD, NAFLD, MAFLD, and DILI.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseSilymarinAntioxidantsHumansLiver CirrhosisProtective AgentsAntioxidantsProtective AgentsSilymarinalcoholic fatty liver diseaseChronic liver diseasedrug-induced liver injuryhepatoprotective and hepatotropic effectsmetabolic-associated fatty liver diseasenon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseoxidative stresssilymarin

Identifiers

PMID35635048
PMCPMC9186366
OpenAlexW4281653857

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.