Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637475›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Quality of life (QoL) among COVID-19 recovered healthcare workers in Bangladesh.

Md Utba Rashid, Md Abdullah Saeed Khan, Koustuv Dalal, Soumik Kha Sagar, Mosharop Hossian, Sabrina Yesmin Barsha, Miah Md Akiful Haque, Mohammad Ali Hossain, Mohammad Hayatun Nabi, Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Long-Term Quality of Life after COVID-19 Infection: Cross-Sectional Study of Health Care Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Quality of Life in Healthcare Workers during COVID-19-A Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Md Utba RashidNutrition and Clinical Services Division (NCSD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Md Abdullah Saeed KhanDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Koustuv DalalSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Public Health Science, Mid Sweden University, 851 70, Sundsvall, Sweden. Koustuv.dalal@miun.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7393-796X
Soumik Kha SagarNutrition and Clinical Services Division (NCSD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Mosharop HossianDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Sabrina Yesmin BarshaDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Miah Md Akiful HaqueDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Ali HossainDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Hayatun NabiDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Delwer Hossain HawladerDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has taken the lives of more than 100,000 healthcare workers (HCWs) so far. Those who survived continuously work under immense physical and psychological pressure, and their quality of life (QoL) is impacted. The study aimed to assess the QoL among HCWs in Bangladesh who recovered from COVID-19.

methodsThis cross-sectional, telephonic interview-based study was conducted among 322 randomly selected HCWs from Bangladesh who were positive for COVID-19 and recovered from the infection before the interview. Data were collected from June to November 2020. We examined the impact of COVID on the QoL of the participants using the validated Bangladesh version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Quality of life questionnaire brief (WHOQOL-BREF). All analyses were done by STATA (Version 16.1).

resultsMore than half of the health care professionals were male (56.0%), aged between 26-35 years (51%), and completed graduation (49%). The majority of the study participants in the four domains were married (n = 263, 81%) and living in Dhaka. The average score of the participants was 70.91 ± 13.07, 62.68 ± 14.99, 66.93 ± 15.14, and 63.56 ± 12.11 in physical, psychological, social relationship and environmental domains, respectively. HCWs in urban areas enjoyed 2.4 times better socially stable lives (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.18-4.96) but 72% less psychologically satisfactory lives.

conclusionHCWs' post-COVID quality of life depended on variable interaction of demographic socioeconomic, including old age, female sex, graduation, and higher monthly income. The findings indicate the issues which should be addressed to improve the quality of life of frontline workers who fight against the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Quality of LifeAdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2BangladeshCOVID-19Healthcare workersQuality of life (QoL)WHOQOL-BREF

Identifiers

PMID35637475
PMCPMC9150765

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.