Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641567›Full record

ArticleCell research2022

Structural and biochemical mechanism for increased infectivity and immune evasion of Omicron BA.2 variant compared to BA.1 and their possible mouse origins.

Youwei Xu, Canrong Wu, Xiaodan Cao, Chunyin Gu, Heng Liu, Mengting Jiang, Xiaoxi Wang, Qingning Yuan, Kai Wu, Jia Liu and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biophysical principles predict fitness of SARS-CoV-2 variants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Youwei Xu *The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8069-7511
Canrong Wu *The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodan Cao *Shanghai Jemincare Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Chunyin Gu *Shanghai Jemincare Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Heng Liu *The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Mengting JiangThe CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxi WangThe CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Qingning YuanThe CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Kai WuThe CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jia LiuShanghai Jemincare Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Deyi WangShanghai Jemincare Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Xianqing HeShanghai Jemincare Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Xueping WangShanghai Jemincare Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Su-Jun DengShanghai Jemincare Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. dengsujun@jemincare.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9266-0644
H Eric XuThe CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. eric.xu@simm.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-6829-8144
Wanchao YinThe CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. wcyin@simm.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-4907
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNJewish Home · USNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNShanghai Institute of Materia Medica · CNShanghaiTech University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Omicron BA.2 variant has become a dominant infective strain worldwide. Receptor binding studies show that the Omicron BA.2 spike trimer exhibits 11-fold and 2-fold higher potency in binding to human ACE2 than the spike trimer from the wildtype (WT) and Omicron BA.1 strains. The structure of the BA.2 spike trimer complexed with human ACE2 reveals that all three receptor-binding domains (RBDs) in the spike trimer are in open conformation, ready for ACE2 binding, thus providing a basis for the increased infectivity of the BA.2 strain. JMB2002, a therapeutic antibody that was shown to efficiently inhibit Omicron BA.1, also shows potent neutralization activities against Omicron BA.2. In addition, both BA.1 and BA.2 spike trimers are able to bind to mouse ACE2 with high potency. In contrast, the WT spike trimer binds well to cat ACE2 but not to mouse ACE2. The structures of both BA.1 and BA.2 spike trimer bound to mouse ACE2 reveal the basis for their high affinity interactions. Together, these results suggest a possible evolution pathway for Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants via a human-cat-mouse-human circle, which could have important implications in establishing an effective strategy for combating SARS-CoV-2 viral infections.

Indexed as

COVID-19Immune EvasionAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingMiceSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, NeutralizingJMB2002Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35641567
PMCPMC9152305
OpenAlexW4281873659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.