Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641900›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

A successful hybrid deep learning model aiming at promoter identification.

Ying Wang, Qinke Peng, Xu Mou, Xinyuan Wang, Haozhou Li, Tian Han, Zhao Sun, Xiao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-gene Co-expression systems inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Core promoterome of barley embryo.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying WangSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Qinke PengSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. qkpeng@xjtu.edu.cn.
Xu MouSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xinyuan WangSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Haozhou LiSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Tian HanSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zhao SunSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiao WangSystems Engineering Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61872288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe zone adjacent to a transcription start site (TSS), namely, the promoter, is primarily involved in the process of DNA transcription initiation and regulation. As a result, proper promoter identification is critical for further understanding the mechanism of the networks controlling genomic regulation. A number of methodologies for the identification of promoters have been proposed. Nonetheless, due to the great heterogeneity existing in promoters, the results of these procedures are still unsatisfactory. In order to establish additional discriminative characteristics and properly recognize promoters, we developed the hybrid model for promoter identification (HMPI), a hybrid deep learning model that can characterize both the native sequences of promoters and the morphological outline of promoters at the same time. We developed the HMPI to combine a method called the PSFN (promoter sequence features network), which characterizes native promoter sequences and deduces sequence features, with a technique referred to as the DSPN (deep structural profiles network), which is specially structured to model the promoters in terms of their structural profile and to deduce their structural attributes.

resultsThe HMPI was applied to human, plant and Escherichia coli K-12 strain datasets, and the findings showed that the HMPI was successful at extracting the features of the promoter while greatly enhancing the promoter identification performance. In addition, after the improvements of synthetic sampling, transfer learning and label smoothing regularization, the improved HMPI models achieved good results in identifying subtypes of promoters on prokaryotic promoter datasets.

conclusionsThe results showed that the HMPI was successful at extracting the features of promoters while greatly enhancing the performance of identifying promoters on both eukaryotic and prokaryotic datasets, and the improved HMPI models are good at identifying subtypes of promoters on prokaryotic promoter datasets. The HMPI is additionally adaptable to different biological functional sequences, allowing for the addition of new features or models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEscherichia coli K12Escherichia coliHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNATranscription Initiation SiteConvolutional neural networks (CNNs)Fully connected networksPromoter identificationStructural profiles

Identifiers

PMID35641900
PMCPMC9158169
OpenAlexW4282925451

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.