Evidence mapPaperPMID 35641913Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Self-monitoring of blood pressure among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review.

Ping Teresa Yeh, Dong Keun Rhee, Caitlin Elizabeth Kennedy, Chloe A Zera, Briana Lucido, Özge Tunçalp, Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de Leon, Manjulaa Narasimhan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ping Teresa YehDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dong Keun RheeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Caitlin Elizabeth KennedyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chloe A ZeraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians, Boston, MA, USA.
Briana LucidoDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction - HRP, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Özge TunçalpDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction - HRP, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de LeonLatin American Center of Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health PAHO/WHO, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Manjulaa NarasimhanDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction - HRP, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland. narasimhanm@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0598-6887
Johns Hopkins University · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) for hypertension management. In addition, during the COVID-19 response, WHO guidance also recommends SMBP supported by health workers although more evidence is needed on whether SMBP of pregnant individuals with hypertension (gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, or pre-eclampsia) may assist in early detection of pre-eclampsia, increase end-user autonomy and empowerment, and reduce health system burden. To expand the evidence base for WHO guideline on self-care interventions, we conducted a systematic review of SMBP during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

methodsWe searched for publications that compared SMBP with clinic-based monitoring during antenatal care. We included studies measuring any of the following outcomes: maternal mortality, pre-eclampsia, long-term risk and complications, autonomy, HELLP syndrome, C-section, antenatal hospital admission, adverse pregnancy outcomes, device-related issues, follow-up care with appropriate management, mental health and well-being, social harms, stillbirth or perinatal death, birthweight/size for gestational age, and Apgar score. After abstract screening and full-text review, we extracted data using standardized forms and summarized findings. We also reviewed studies assessing values and preferences as well as costs of SMBP.

resultsWe identified 6 studies meeting inclusion criteria for the effectiveness of SMBP, 6 studies on values and preferences, and 1 study on costs. All were from high-income countries. Overall, when comparing SMBP with clinic-monitoring, there was no difference in the risks for most of the outcomes for which data were available, though there was some evidence of increased risk of C-section among pregnant women with chronic hypertension. Most end-users and providers supported SMBP, motivated by ease of use, convenience, self-empowerment and reduced anxiety. One study found SMBP would lower health sector costs.

conclusionLimited evidence suggests that SMBP during pregnancy is feasible and acceptable, and generally associated with maternal and neonatal health outcomes similar to clinic-based monitoring. However, more research is needed in resource-limited settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021233839 .

Indexed as

COVID-19Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPre-EclampsiaBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyBlood pressureHypertensionPre-eclampsiaPregnancySelf-careSelf-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35641913
PMCPMC9152837
OpenAlexW4281690933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.