Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643939›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

A literature review to understand the burden of disease in people living with tumour-induced osteomalacia.

Salvatore Minisola, Adele Barlassina, Sally-Anne Vincent, Sue Wood, Angela Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Healthcare Resource Use Associated With Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Literature Review.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Approaching virtual osteoid volume estimation and in-depth tissue characterization in patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Osteomalacia Is Not a Single Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Salvatore MinisolaSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Adele BarlassinaOPEN Health, Marlow, United Kingdom. adelebarlassina@openhealthgroup.com.
Sally-Anne VincentOPEN Health, Marlow, United Kingdom.
Sue WoodKyowa Kirin International, Marlow, United Kingdom.
Angela WilliamsKyowa Kirin International, Marlow, United Kingdom.
Kyowa Kirin International (United Kingdom) · GBSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reviews publications to describe the signs, symptoms and impact of tumour-induced osteomalacia (TIO) on patients' burden of disease. TIO is associated with a spectrum of signs and symptoms imposing a significant clinical burden, but the psychosocial impact of this rare disease has been poorly researched so far.

introductionTo describe the signs, symptoms and impacts of tumour-induced osteomalacia (TIO) and summarise the state of research on the burden of disease of this ultra-rare condition.

methodsA targeted literature review was conducted in PubMed using pre-defined search terms. Relevant articles published between 1980 and 2021 were screened for inclusion. Seventy records were selected for analysis. Data were extracted and grouped into categories and sub-categories to identify recurrent signs, symptoms and impacts of TIO and describe the burden on patients. Chord diagrams were created to analyse the relationships between different TIO outcomes and characterise the presentation of TIO.

resultsAlthough the number of articles on TIO published have been increasing over the past 20 years, most studies were case reports and case series (n = 65/70) and only few were studies with higher quality of evidence (n = 5/70). Most articles were based on data reported by clinicians (n = 67/70). Patients with TIO experienced a combination of outcomes including chronic pain, weakness, skeletal-related manifestations and limitations in mobility. Only a few studies (n = 2/70) analysed the burden of TIO on the emotional wellbeing and on the work life of the patient.

conclusionPatients with TIO present with a spectrum of signs and symptoms that impose a significant burden. The impact on the psychosocial wellbeing of patients should be further investigated, as this has been poorly researched so far. Studies with high quality of evidence should be designed to further the understanding of the burden of disease of TIO from the patient's perspective.

Indexed as

HypophosphatemiaNeoplasms, Connective TissueOsteomalaciaCost of IllnessFibroblast Growth FactorsHumansParaneoplastic SyndromesFibroblast Growth FactorsBurden of diseaseHypophosphatemiaTumour-induced osteomalaciaUltra-rare diseases

Identifiers

PMID35643939
PMCPMC9463218
OpenAlexW4281751274

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.