Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35645891›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Amy Maloy, Annischa Main, Claire Murphy, Lauren Coleman, Robson Dodd, Jessica Lynch, Donna Larkin, Paul Flowers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amy MaloyHumanities and Social Sciences Department, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Annischa MainHumanities and Social Sciences Department, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Claire MurphyHumanities and Social Sciences Department, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Lauren ColemanHumanities and Social Sciences Department, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Robson DoddHumanities and Social Sciences Department, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jessica LynchHumanities and Social Sciences Department, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Donna LarkinHumanities and Social Sciences Department, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paul FlowersHumanities and Social Sciences Department, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 lockdown presented a novel opportunity to study the experiences of people attempting to maintain friendships in the context of worldwide, government-enforced physical distancing and lockdown. Here we report on an experiential, idiographic qualitative project with a purposive sample of Scottish students. Data was collected

Indexed as

COVID19friendshipgrowthinterpretative phenomenological analysislockdownreciprocitysupport

Identifiers

PMID35645891
PMCPMC9138709

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.