ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2022
Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidance on Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.
Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indirect bilirubin mitigates tubular vacuolization and injury in experimental contrast nephropathy.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Effects of contrast on opportunistic computed tomography vertebral bone mineral density analysis using internal calibration.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Study on the effect of three-low technique in aortic computed tomography angiography for patients with body mass index <30 kg/mQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor on contrast-induced acute kidney injury and prognosis in type 2 diabetes patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- COJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Current updates in radiocontrast-associated acute kidney injury.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024Review
- The use of intravascular contrast media in patients with impaired kidney function - joint clinical practice position statement of the Polish Society of Nephrology and the Polish Medical Society of Radiology.Polish journal of radiology · 2024Review
- A Simple Strategy to Reduce Contrast Media Use and Risk of Contrast-Induced Renal Injury during PCI: Introduction of an "Optimal Contrast Volume Protocol" to Daily Clinical Practice.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Diagnosis, pathophysiology and preventive strategies for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a narrative review.European journal of medical research · 2023Review
- Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Contrast Media-Induced Adverse Drug Reaction's Reporting? A Pharmacovigilance Study in Southern Italy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Iodinated contrast media is one of the most frequently administered pharmaceuticals. In Canada, over 5.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in 2019, of which 50% were contrast enhanced. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after iodinated contrast administration was historically considered a common iatrogenic complication which was managed by screening patients, prophylactic strategies, and follow-up evaluation of renal function. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) initially published guidelines on the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy in 2007, with an update in 2012. However, new developments in the field have led to the availability of safer contrast agents and changes in clinical practice, prompting a complete revision of the earlier recommendations. Information sources: Published literature, including clinical trials, retrospective cohort series, review articles, and case reports, along with expert opinions from radiologists and nephrologists across Canada. Methods: The leadership of the CAR formed a working group of radiologists and nephrologists with expertise in contrast administration and patient management related to contrast-associated AKI. We conducted a comprehensive review of the published literature to evaluate the evidence about contrast as a cause of AKI, and to inform evidence-based recommendations. Based on the available literature, the working group developed consensus recommendations. Key Findings: The working group developed 21 recommendations, on screening, choice of iodinated contrast media, prophylaxis, medication considerations, and post contrast administration management. The key changes from the 2012 guidelines were (1) Simplification of screening to a simple questionnaire, and not delaying emergent examinations due to a need for creatinine measurements (2) Prophylaxis considerations only for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (3) Not recommending the routine discontinuation of any drugs to decrease risk of AKI, except metformin when eGFR is less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and (4) Not requiring routine follow up serum creatinine measurements post iodinated contrast administration. Limitations: We did not conduct a formal systematic review or meta-analysis. We did not evaluate our specific suggestions in the clinical environment. Implications: Given the importance of iodinated contrast media use in diagnosis and management, and the low risk of AKI after contrast use, these guidelines aim to streamline the processes around iodinated contrast use in most clinical settings. As newer evidence arises that may change or add to the recommendations provided, the working group will revise these guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.