ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Optical Coherence Tomography: An Eye Into the Coronary Artery.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-time IVUS-guided retrieval of a coronary retained guidewire fragment: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Intravascular Imaging Versus Physiology Assessment for Intermediate Lesions During PCI.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Coronary Artery Calcification: From Molecular Mechanisms to Interventional Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Saline vs Contrast for Optical Coherence Tomography During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Multicenter Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence and Clinical Practice : Short title:Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Galen medical journal · 2026Review
- Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review of Optical Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Young ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Autolysis: Survival of the Blessed.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Mapping the distribution of radial artery atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Advantages of hybrid intravascular ultrasound-optical coherence tomography system in clinical practice.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Optical theranostics in ischemic heart disease: from molecular insights to clinical translation.Theranostics · 2025Review
- The morphology of internal elastic lamina corrugations in arteries under physiological conditions.Morphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes · 2024Article
- Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Viewing early life without labels: optical approaches for imaging the early embryo†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Review
- Assessing the efficacy of saline flush in frequency-domain optical coherence tomography for intracoronary imaging.Heart and vessels · 2024Article
- Nailing the left anterior artery ostium in true 0,1,0 left main bifurcation disease and understanding its complication using optical coherence tomography.European heart journal. Case reports · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of angiographically unclear coronary lesions.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Consensus of the National Heart Center in collaboration With the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Clinical Use of Intracoronary Imaging.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is slowly but surely gaining a foothold in the hands of interventional cardiologists. Intraluminal and transmural contents of the coronary arteries are no longer elusive to the cardiologist's probing eye. Although the graduation of an interventionalist in imaging techniques right from naked eye angiographies to ultrasound-based coronary sonographies to the modern light-based OCT has been slow, with the increasing regularity of complex coronary cases in practice, such a transition is inevitable. Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) due to its robust clinical data has been the preferred imaging modality in recent years, OCT provides a distinct upgrade over it in many imaging and procedural aspects. Better image resolution, accurate estimation of the calcified lesion, and better evaluation of acute and chronic stent failure are the distinct advantages of OCT over IVUS. Despite the obvious imaging advantages of OCT, its clinical impact remains subdued. However, upcoming newer trials and data have been encouraging for expanding the use of OCT to wider indications in clinical utility. During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), OCT provides the detailed information (dissection, tissue prolapse, thrombi, and incomplete stent apposition) required for optimal stent deployment, which is the key to successfully reducing the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and stent-related morbidities. The increasing use of OCT in complex bifurcation stenting involving the left main (LM) is being studied. Also, the traditional pitfalls of OCT, such as additional contrast load for image acquisition and stenting involving the ostial and proximal LM, have also been overcome recently. In this review, we discuss the interpretation of OCT images and its clinical impact on the outcome of procedures along with current barriers to its use and newer paradigms in which OCT is starting to become a promising tool for the interventionalist and what can be expected for the immediate future in the imaging world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.