Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647059›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Optical Coherence Tomography: An Eye Into the Coronary Artery.

Ankush Gupta, Abhinav Shrivastava, Rajesh Vijayvergiya, Sanya Chhikara, Rajat Datta, Atiya Aziz, Daulat Singh Meena, Ranjit Kumar Nath, J Ratheesh Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review of Optical Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnosis and treatment of angiographically unclear coronary lesions.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ankush GuptaDepartment of Cardiology, Military Hospital Jaipur, Jaipur, India.
Abhinav ShrivastavaDepartment of Cardiology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia (RML) Hospital & Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences (ABVIMS), New Delhi, India.
Rajesh VijayvergiyaAdvanced Cardiac Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Sanya ChhikaraUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Rajat DattaDirector General Armed Forces Medical Services, O/o DGAFMS, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi, India.
Atiya AzizDepartment of Cardiology, Military Hospital Jaipur, Jaipur, India.
Daulat Singh MeenaDepartment of Cardiology, Jawahar Lal Nehru (J.L.N.) Medical College, Ajmer, India.
Ranjit Kumar NathDepartment of Cardiology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia (RML) Hospital & Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences (ABVIMS), New Delhi, India.
J Ratheesh KumarArmy Hospital Research and Referral (AHR&R), New Delhi, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences · INArmy Hospital Research and Referral · INJawaharlal Nehru Medical College · INMinistry of Defence · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is slowly but surely gaining a foothold in the hands of interventional cardiologists. Intraluminal and transmural contents of the coronary arteries are no longer elusive to the cardiologist's probing eye. Although the graduation of an interventionalist in imaging techniques right from naked eye angiographies to ultrasound-based coronary sonographies to the modern light-based OCT has been slow, with the increasing regularity of complex coronary cases in practice, such a transition is inevitable. Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) due to its robust clinical data has been the preferred imaging modality in recent years, OCT provides a distinct upgrade over it in many imaging and procedural aspects. Better image resolution, accurate estimation of the calcified lesion, and better evaluation of acute and chronic stent failure are the distinct advantages of OCT over IVUS. Despite the obvious imaging advantages of OCT, its clinical impact remains subdued. However, upcoming newer trials and data have been encouraging for expanding the use of OCT to wider indications in clinical utility. During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), OCT provides the detailed information (dissection, tissue prolapse, thrombi, and incomplete stent apposition) required for optimal stent deployment, which is the key to successfully reducing the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and stent-related morbidities. The increasing use of OCT in complex bifurcation stenting involving the left main (LM) is being studied. Also, the traditional pitfalls of OCT, such as additional contrast load for image acquisition and stenting involving the ostial and proximal LM, have also been overcome recently. In this review, we discuss the interpretation of OCT images and its clinical impact on the outcome of procedures along with current barriers to its use and newer paradigms in which OCT is starting to become a promising tool for the interventionalist and what can be expected for the immediate future in the imaging world.

Indexed as

calcified lesion modificationIVUSOCTOCT in ACSOCT in bifurcation angioplastyOCT in left main bifurcation angioplastyplaque morphologysaline OCT

Identifiers

PMID35647059
PMCPMC9130606
OpenAlexW4280602626

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.