SynthesisPloS one2022
Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of Rh-endostatin in the treatment of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Xuebijing Promotes HMGB1-Mediated Autophagy to Alleviate Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Heat Stroke-Induced Brain Damage.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Mechanism of Shashen Maidong Decoction in the Treatment of Radiation Pneumonitis Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, the treatment of radiation pneumonitis (RP) remains a clinical challenge. Although glucocorticoids are used for RP treatment, they have associated side effects. Xuebijing injection (XBJ) has been widely used for RP treatment in China, but so far no meta-analysis has evaluated its efficacy and safety.
methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, SinoMED, and China Science and Technology J Database were searched for randomized controlled trials related to XBJ in RP treatment. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The outcomes were synthesized and analyzed using the Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan 5.3) software, and a forest plot generated.
resultEight articles met the eligibility criteria for further data extraction and meta-analysis. A total of 578 patients with RP participated in these studies, including 296 in the experimental group (XBJ+BT), and 282 in the control group (BT). The results of the meta-analysis revealed that compared to the BT group, XBJ+BT significantly increased the total effective rate (n = 578; RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.61, p<0.0001), and IL-10 expression (n = 296; MD = 17.62, 95% CI:13.95 to 21.29, p<0.00001), decreased interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression (n = 296; MD = -21.56, 95% CI:-27.37 to -15.76, p<0.00001), that of tumor necrosis factor alpha (n = 246; MD = -25.63, 95% CI:-30.77 to -20.50, p<0.00001), and that of C-reactive protein (n = 296; MD = -48.61, 95% CI:-56.49-40.73, p< 0.00001).
conclusionBased on our results, we do not recommend XBJ as an adjuvant treatment for RP. Further randomized controlled trials with rigorous design, strict implementation, and standard reporting are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of XBJ for RP treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY registration number: INPLASY2020120037.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.