ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022
Application of Non-Blood-Derived Fluid Biopsy in Monitoring Minimal Residual Diseases of Lung Cancer.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of preoperative needle biopsy for lung cancer on survival and recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery today · 2024Pooled it
- Value of RASSF1A and SHOX2 methylation detection in intraoperative pleural lavage fluid for potential microdissemination and prognosis evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The 3PM transformation potential of minimal residual disease in solid tumor management: a bibliometric analysis and review.The EPMA journal · 2025Review
- Clinical application of minimal residual disease detection by ctDNA testing in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Melanoma's New Frontier: Exploring the Latest Advances in Blood-Based Biomarkers for Melanoma.Cancers · 2024Review
- Liquid biopsy for gastric cancer: Techniques, applications, and future directions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Can Liquid Biopsy Based on ctDNA/cfDNA Replace Tissue Biopsy for the Precision Treatment of EGFR-Mutated NSCLC?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the most fatal malignant tumors in the world. Overcoming this disease is difficult due to its late diagnosis and relapse after treatment. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is described as the presence of free circulating tumor cells or other tumor cell derivatives in the biological fluid of patients without any clinical symptoms of cancer and negative imaging examination after the treatment of primary tumors. It has been widely discussed in the medical community as a bridge to solid tumor recurrence. Radiology, serology (carcinoembryonic antigen), and other clinical diagnosis and treatment methods widely used to monitor the progression of disease recurrence have obvious time-limited and -specific defects. Furthermore, as most samples of traditional liquid biopsies come from patients' blood (including plasma and serum), the low concentration of tumor markers in blood samples limits the ability of these liquid biopsies in the early detection of cancer recurrence. The use of non-blood-derived fluid biopsy in monitoring the status of MRD and further improving the postoperative individualized treatment of patients with lung cancer is gradually ushering in the dawn of hope. This paper reviews the progress of several non-blood-derived fluid samples (urine, saliva, sputum, and pleural effusion) in detecting MRD in lung cancer as well as selecting the accurate treatment for it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.