Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35652496›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Dynamically Responsive Scaffolds from Microfluidic 3D Printing for Skin Flap Regeneration.

Xiaocheng Wang, Yunru Yu, Chaoyu Yang, Luoran Shang, Yuanjin Zhao, Xian Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Smart Bioinks for 4D Bioprinting: Requirements, Design, and Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. MXene Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: Design and Translation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. METTL3-dependent mAutophagy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaocheng WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5268-1050
Yunru YuDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210002, China.
Chaoyu YangOujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325001, China.
Luoran ShangOujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325001, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7458-9100
Yuanjin ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Xian ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9242-4000
Wenzhou Medical University · CNFudan University · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNZhejiang Lab · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2021M700141National Key Research and Development Program of China 2020YFA0908200National Natural Science Foundation of China 52073060National Natural Science Foundation of China 61927805Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program JCYJ20190813152616459Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program JCYJ20210324133214038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological scaffolds hold promising perspectives for random skin flap regeneration, while the practical application is greatly limited by their insufficient vascularization ability and the lack of responsiveness during the dynamical healing process. Herein, a novel MXene-incorporated hollow fibrous (MX-HF) scaffold with dynamically responsive channels is presented for promoting vascularization and skin flap regeneration by using a microfluidic-assisted 3D printing strategy. Benefiting from the photothermal conversion capacity of the MXene nanosheets and temperature-responsive ability of poly(NIPAM) hydrogels in the MX-HF scaffolds, they display a near-infrared (NIR)-responsive shrinkage/swelling behavior, which facilitates the cell penetration into the scaffold channels from the surrounding environment. Moreover, by incorporating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) into the hydrogel matrix for controllable delivery, the MX-HF scaffolds can achieve promoted proliferation, migration, and proangiogenic effects of endothelial cells under NIR irradiation. It is further demonstrated in vivo that the NIR-responsive VEGF@MX-HF scaffolds can effectively improve skin flap survival by promoting angiogenesis, decreasing inflammation, and attenuating apoptosis in skin flaps. Thus, it is believed that such responsive MX-HF scaffolds are promising candidates for clinical random skin flap regeneration as well as other diverse tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AEndothelial CellsHydrogelsMicrofluidicsPrinting, Three-DimensionalWound HealingHydrogelsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A3D printingmicrofluidicsphotothermalregenerationscaffoldvascularization

Identifiers

PMID35652496
PMCPMC9353450
OpenAlexW4281687213

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.