Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655320›Full record

Trial reportJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2022

A first-in-human phase 1/2 study of FGF401 and combination of FGF401 with spartalizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or biomarker-selected solid tumors.

Stephen L Chan, Martin Schuler, Yoon-Koo Kang, Chia-Jui Yen, Julien Edeline, Su Pin Choo, Chia-Chi Lin, Takuji Okusaka, Karl-Heinz Weiss, Teresa Macarulla and 26 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02325739 (A Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-label Study of Oral FGF401 in Adult Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Solid Malignancies Characterized by Positive FGFR4 and KLB Expression), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02325739 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-label Study of Oral FGF401 in Adult Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Solid Malignancies Characterized by Positive FGFR4 and KLB Expression

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2014 to 2019Enrolled172ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Solid MalignanciesArmsFGF401, PDR001
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Novel Therapeutics for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Clinics in liver disease · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Stephen L ChanState Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. chanlam_stephen@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8998-5480
Martin SchulerWest German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Yoon-Koo KangAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chia-Jui YenDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Julien EdelineCentre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France and ARPEGO (Accès à La Recherche Précoce Dans Le Grand-Ouest) Network, Rennes, France.
Su Pin ChooNational Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Chia-Chi LinNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Takuji OkusakaNational Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Karl-Heinz WeissSalem Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
Teresa MacarullaVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB Quirón, Barcelona, Spain.
Stéphane CattanChru de Lille, Lille, France.
Jean-Frederic BlancCHU de Bordeaux Pessac, Bordeaux, France.
Kyung-Hun LeeSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Michela MaurUniversity Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Shubham PantMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Masatoshi KudoKindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Eric AssenatHôpital Saint-Eloi Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Andrew X ZhuMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas YauQueen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Ho Yeong LimSamsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jordi BruixBarcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Andreas GeierUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Carmen Guillén-PonceHospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Angelica FasoloSan Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Richard S FinnUniversity of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jia FanZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Arndt VogelHannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Shukui QinNo. 81th PLA Hospital Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Markus RiesterNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Vasiliki KatsanouNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Monica ChaudhariIQVIA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Tomoyuki KakizumeNovartis Pharma K.K, Tokyo, Japan.
Yi GuNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Diana Graus PortaNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea MyersNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Jean-Pierre DelordIUCT Oncopole - Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
Novartis (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CH81th Hospital of PLA · CNCentre Eugène Marquis · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESChinese University of Hong Kong · HKEssen University Hospital · DEHôpital Saint Eloi · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESIQVIA (United States) · USKindai University Hospital · JPKrankenhaus Salem · DEMassachusetts General Hospital · USMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENational Cancer Centre Japan · JPNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeregulation of FGF19-FGFR4 signaling is found in several cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nominating it for therapeutic targeting. FGF401 is a potent, selective FGFR4 inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models. This study was designed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), characterize PK/PD, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of FGF401 alone and combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody, spartalizumab.

methodsPatients with HCC or other FGFR4/KLB expressing tumors were enrolled. Dose-escalation was guided by a Bayesian model. Phase 2 dose-expansion enrolled patients with HCC from Asian countries (group1), non-Asian countries (group2), and patients with other solid tumors expressing FGFR4 and KLB (group3). FGF401 and spartalizumab combination was evaluated in patients with HCC.

resultsSeventy-four patients were treated in the phase I with single-agent FGF401 at 50 to 150 mg. FGF401 displayed favorable PK characteristics and no food effect when dosed with low-fat meals. The RP2D was established as 120 mg qd. Six of 70 patients experienced grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities: increase in transaminases (n = 4) or blood bilirubin (n = 2). In phase 2, 30 patients in group 1, 36 in group 2, and 20 in group 3 received FGF401. In total, 8 patients experienced objective responses (1 CR, 7 PR; 4 each in phase I and phase II, respectively). Frequent adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (73.8%), increased AST (47.5%), and ALT (43.8%). Increase in levels of C4, total bile acid, and circulating FGF19, confirmed effective FGFR4 inhibition. Twelve patients received FGF401 plus spartalizumab. RP2D was established as FGF401 120 mg qd and spartalizumab 300 mg Q3W; 2 patients reported PR.

conclusionsAt biologically active doses, FGF401 alone or combined with spartalizumab was safe in patients with FGFR4/KLB-positive tumors including HCC. Preliminary clinical efficacy was observed. Further clinical evaluation of FGF401 using a refined biomarker strategy is warranted.

trial registrationNCT02325739 .

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBayes TheoremBiomarkersHumansPiperazinesPyridinesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersPiperazinesPyridinesroblitinibspartalizumabFGF19FGFR4Hepatocellular carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsKLBPD-1PD-L1Phase 1

Identifiers

PMID35655320
PMCPMC9161616
OpenAlexW4281609929

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.