Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35660213›Full record

SynthesisThe Lancet. Public health2022

How do income changes impact on mental health and wellbeing for working-age adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rachel M Thomson, Erik Igelström, Amrit Kaur Purba, Michal Shimonovich, Hilary Thomson, Gerry McCartney, Aaron Reeves, Alastair Leyland, Anna Pearce, S Vittal Katikireddi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Lancet. Public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Quality of life among people living with mental illness and predictors in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Return to work experience on structural constraints and gendered differences among nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  17. Caregiver distress explains links between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviors.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rachel M ThomsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: rachel.thomson@glasgow.ac.uk.
Erik IgelströmMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Amrit Kaur PurbaMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Michal ShimonovichMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Hilary ThomsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Gerry McCartneySchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Aaron ReevesDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alastair LeylandMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Anna PearceMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
S Vittal KatikireddiMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SCAF/15/02Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2Wellcome Trust 205412Wellcome Trust 205412/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 218105Wellcome Trust 218105/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLower incomes are associated with poorer mental health and wellbeing, but the extent to which income has a causal effect is debated. We aimed to synthesise evidence from studies measuring the impact of changes in individual and household income on mental health and wellbeing outcomes in working-age adults (aged 16-64 years).

methodsFor this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ASSIA, EconLit, and RePEc on Feb 5, 2020, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quantitative non-randomised studies. We had no date limits for our search. We included English-language studies measuring effects of individual or household income change on any mental health or wellbeing outcome. We used Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tools. We conducted three-level random-effects meta-analyses, and explored heterogeneity using meta-regression and stratified analyses. Synthesis without meta-analysis was based on effect direction. Critical RoB studies were excluded from primary analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020168379.

findingsOf 16 521 citations screened, 136 were narratively synthesised (12·5% RCTs) and 86 meta-analysed. RoB was high: 30·1% were rated critical and 47·1% serious or high. A binary income increase lifting individuals out of poverty was associated with 0·13 SD improvement in mental health measures (95% CI 0·07 to 0·20; n=42 128; 18 studies), considerably larger than other income increases (0·01 SD improvement, 0·002 to 0·019; n=216 509, 14 studies). For wellbeing, increases out of poverty were associated with 0·38 SD improvement (0·09 to 0·66; n=101 350, 8 studies) versus 0·16 for other income increases (0·07 to 0·25; n=62 619, 11 studies). Income decreases from any source were associated with 0·21 SD worsening of mental health measures (-0·30 to -0·13; n=227 804, 11 studies). Effect sizes were larger in low-income and middle-income settings and in higher RoB studies. Heterogeneity was high (I

interpretationIncome changes probably impact mental health, particularly where they move individuals out of poverty, although effect sizes are modest and certainty low. Effects are larger for wellbeing outcomes, and potentially for income losses. To best support population mental health, welfare policies need to reach the most socioeconomically disadvantaged.

fundingWellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Chief Scientist Office, and European Research Council.

Indexed as

IncomeMental HealthAdultHumansPovertySocial Welfare

Identifiers

PMID35660213
PMCPMC7614874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.