Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35662507›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2022

The DUB Club: Deubiquitinating Enzymes and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Lachlan A Jolly, Raman Kumar, Peter Penzes, Michael Piper, Jozef Gecz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A De NovoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deubiquitinases in muscle physiology and disorders.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Life science alliance · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Regulation of apoptosis by ubiquitination in liver cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lachlan A JollyUniversity of Adelaide and Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: Lachlan.Jolly@adelaide.edu.au.
Raman KumarUniversity of Adelaide and Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter PenzesDepartment of Neuroscience, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Michael PiperSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jozef GeczUniversity of Adelaide and Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUNorthwestern University · USSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Postsynaptic roles of ankyrinsR01MH107182 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Peter Penzes · 2015 to 2026
$5.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein ubiquitination is a widespread, multifunctional, posttranslational protein modification, best known for its ability to direct protein degradation via the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). Ubiquitination is also reversible, and the human genome encodes over 90 deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), many of which appear to target specific subsets of ubiquitinated proteins. This review focuses on the roles of DUBs in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). We present the current genetic evidence connecting 12 DUBs to a range of NDDs and the functional studies implicating at least 19 additional DUBs as candidate NDD genes. We highlight how the study of DUBs in NDDs offers critical insights into the role of protein degradation during brain development. Because one of the major known functions of a DUB is to antagonize the UPS, loss of function of DUB genes has been shown to culminate in loss of abundance of its protein substrates. The identification and study of NDD DUB substrates in the developing brain is revealing that they regulate networks of proteins that themselves are encoded by NDD genes. We describe the new technologies that are enabling the full resolution of DUB protein networks in the developing brain, with the view that this knowledge can direct the development of new therapeutic paradigms. The fact that the abundance of many NDD proteins is regulated by the UPS presents an exciting opportunity to combat NDDs caused by haploinsufficiency, because the loss of abundance of NDD proteins can be potentially rectified by antagonizing their UPS-based degradation.

Indexed as

Neurodevelopmental DisordersUbiquitinated ProteinsDeubiquitinating EnzymesHumansProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexUbiquitinDeubiquitinating EnzymesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexUbiquitinUbiquitinated ProteinsBrain developmentDeubiquitinating enzymeNeurodevelopmental disorderUbiquitinUbiquitin proteasome system

Identifiers

PMID35662507
PMCPMC10084722
OpenAlexW4223468652

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.