ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2022
Determination of the Cut-off Value for Imatinib Plasma Levels Linked to Occurrence of Bone Pain in CML Patients.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Imatinib is used to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Variations in imatinib pharmacokinetics have been linked to genetic variations. That has an impact on imatinib response and adverse effects. Therefore, the aim of the study was to study bone pain as an adverse effect that occurs with imatinib and to investigate the risk factors for bone pain. Methods: The relationship between the peak and trough plasma concentrations of imatinib with bone pain as one of the most frequently occurring adverse effects was examined. Multiple linear regression analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to measure the impact of various patients' characteristics on both peak and trough imatinib concentrations and the risk of the occurrence of imatinib-induced bone pain. Results: As a side effect of imatinib, approximately 15% of patients with CML who were taking it experienced bone pain. This side effect was linked to the imatinib peak and trough plasma levels. Imatinib trough concentration was also linked to gender and the gene SLCO1B3-334T > G (TT). There were significant associations between peak concentrations and gender as well as patient weight. Conclusion: Higher peak and trough plasma concentrations of imatinib are linked with the risk of the occurrence of bone pain as a side effect of imatinib. Monitoring plasma concentrations of imatinib is useful to predict the bone pain of imatinib and to support quality of life in patients with CML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.