Evidence mapPaperPMID 35677553Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

The Feasibility and User-Experience of a Digital Health Intervention Designed to Prevent Weight Gain in New Kidney Transplant Recipients-The ExeRTiOn2 Trial.

Ellen M Castle, Giulia Dijk, Elham Asgari, Sapna Shah, Rachel Phillips, James Greenwood, Kate Bramham, Joseph Chilcot, Sharlene A Greenwood

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03996551 (ExeRTiOn2- The Weight Gain Prevention Exercise in Renal Transplant Online Study. A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03996551 nacompletednot on this map

ExeRTiOn2- The Weight Gain Prevention Exercise in Renal Transplant Online Study. A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College Hospital NHS TrustRan2019 to 2021Enrolled17ConditionsKidney Transplant, Complications, Weight GainArmsExeRTiOn online resource
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Mental health and kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen M CastleTherapies Department, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Giulia DijkDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Elham AsgariKidney Services Team, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London, London, United Kingdom.
Sapna ShahKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Rachel PhillipsImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
James GreenwoodVictor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Kate BramhamKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph ChilcotDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sharlene A GreenwoodTherapies Department, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
King's College Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Half of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) gain more than 5% of their body weight in the first year following transplantation. KTRs have requested support with physical activity (PA) and weight gain prevention, but there is no routine care offered. There are few high-quality studies investigating the clinical value of diet, PA or combined interventions to prevent weight gain. The development and evaluation of theoretically informed complex-interventions to mitigate weight gain are warranted. The aims of this mixed-methods randomized controlled trial (RCT) were to explore the feasibility, acceptability and user-experience of a digital healthcare intervention (DHI) designed to prevent post-transplant weight gain, in preparation for a large multi-center trial. New KTRs (<3 months) with access to an internet compatible device were recruited from a London transplant center. The usual care (UC) group received standard dietary and PA advice. The intervention group (IG) received access to a 12-week DHI designed to prevent post-transplant weight gain. Primary feasibility outcomes included screening, recruitment, retention, adherence, safety and hospitalizations and engagement and experience with the DHI. Secondary outcomes (anthropometrics, bioimpedance, arterial stiffness, 6-minute walk distance and questionnaires) were measured at baseline, 3- and 12-months. 38 KTRs were screened, of which 32 (84.2%) were eligible, and of those 20 (62.5%) consented, with 17 participants (85%) completing baseline assessment (Median 49 years, 58.8% male, Median 62 days post-transplant). Participants were randomized using a computer-generated list ( Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03996551.

Indexed as

behavior changekidney transplantationphysical activityweb-based interventionweight gain prevention

Identifiers

PMID35677553
PMCPMC9168981
OpenAlexW4281296747

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.