Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677880›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Accelerating GPCR Drug Discovery With Conformation-Stabilizing VHHs.

Toon Laeremans, Zara A Sands, Pieter Claes, Ann De Blieck, Stephane De Cesco, Sarah Triest, Andreas Busch, David Felix, Abhinav Kumar, Veli-Pekka Jaakola and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Integrins as Drug Targets in Vascular and Related Diseases.International journal of drug discovery and pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Two in one: the emerging concept of bifunctional antibodies.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Toon LaeremansConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Zara A SandsConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Pieter ClaesConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Ann De BlieckConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Stephane De CescoConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Sarah TriestConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Andreas BuschConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
David FelixConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Abhinav KumarConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Veli-Pekka JaakolaConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Christel MenetConfo Therapeutics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human genome encodes 850 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), half of which are considered potential drug targets. GPCRs transduce extracellular stimuli into a plethora of vital physiological processes. Consequently, GPCRs are an attractive drug target class. This is underlined by the fact that approximately 40% of marketed drugs modulate GPCRs. Intriguingly 60% of non-olfactory GPCRs have no drugs or candidates in clinical development, highlighting the continued potential of GPCRs as drug targets. The discovery of small molecules targeting these GPCRs by conventional high throughput screening (HTS) campaigns is challenging. Although the definition of success varies per company, the success rate of HTS for GPCRs is low compared to other target families (Fujioka and Omori, 2012; Dragovich et al., 2022). Beyond this, GPCR structure determination can be difficult, which often precludes the application of structure-based drug design approaches to arising HTS hits. GPCR structural studies entail the resource-demanding purification of native receptors, which can be challenging as they are inherently unstable when extracted from the lipid matrix. Moreover, GPCRs are flexible molecules that adopt distinct conformations, some of which need to be stabilized if they are to be structurally resolved. The complexity of targeting distinct therapeutically relevant GPCR conformations during the early discovery stages contributes to the high attrition rates for GPCR drug discovery programs. Multiple strategies have been explored in an attempt to stabilize GPCRs in distinct conformations to better understand their pharmacology. This review will focus on the use of camelid-derived immunoglobulin single variable domains (VHHs) that stabilize disease-relevant pharmacological states (termed ConfoBodies by the authors) of GPCRs, as well as GPCR:signal transducer complexes, to accelerate drug discovery. These VHHs are powerful tools for supporting in vitro screening, deconvolution of complex GPCR pharmacology, and structural biology purposes. In order to demonstrate the potential impact of ConfoBodies on translational research, examples are presented of their role in active state screening campaigns and structure-informed rational design to identify

Indexed as

active statebiosensorConfoBodyconformationconformerGPCRSBDDVHH

Identifiers

PMID35677880
PMCPMC9170359
OpenAlexW4281289153

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.