Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35680274›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEGEND-T2DM): a protocol for a series of multinational, real-world comparative cardiovascular effectiveness and safety studies.

Rohan Khera, Martijn J Schuemie, Yuan Lu, Anna Ostropolets, RuiJun Chen, George Hripcsak, Patrick B Ryan, Harlan M Krumholz, Marc A Suchard

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A pipeline for enabling path-specific causal fairness in observational health data.Proceedings of the ... Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · 2026
    Article
  10. Semaglutide and diabetic retinopathy: an OHDSI network study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025 · on this map
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessing Covariate Balance with Small Sample Sizes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A Generalized Tool to Assess Algorithmic Fairness in Disease Phenotype Definitions.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rohan KheraSection of Cardiovascular Medine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9467-6199
Martijn J SchuemieDepartment of Epidemiology Analytics, Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0817-5361
Yuan LuSection of Cardiovascular Medine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5264-2169
Anna OstropoletsDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0847-6682
RuiJun ChenDepartment of Translational Data Science and Informatics, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Patrick B RyanDepartment of Epidemiology Analytics, Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.
Harlan M KrumholzSection of Cardiovascular Medine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-127X
Marc A SuchardDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA msuchard@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9818-479X
Yale University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USGeisinger Medical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
DISCOVERING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE IN CLINICAL DATABASESR01LM006910 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HRIPCSAK, GEORGE M · 2000 to 2023
$10.6M
Genomics, GPUs, and Next Generation Computational StatisticsR01HG006139 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SOBEL, ERIC · 2011 to 2023
$5.1M
Evaluating and Improving Utilization of Evidence-Based Medical Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure using Automated Tools in the Electronic Health RecordK23HL153775 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KHERA, ROHAN · 2021 to 2025
$918k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006139NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL153775NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTherapeutic options for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have expanded over the last decade with the emergence of cardioprotective novel agents, but without such data for older drugs, leaving a critical gap in our understanding of the relative effects of T2DM agents on cardiovascular risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The large-scale evidence generations across a network of databases for T2DM (LEGEND-T2DM) initiative is a series of systematic, large-scale, multinational, real-world comparative cardiovascular effectiveness and safety studies of all four major second-line anti-hyperglycaemic agents, including sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and sulfonylureas. LEGEND-T2DM will leverage the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) community that provides access to a global network of administrative claims and electronic health record data sources, representing 190 million patients in the USA and about 50 million internationally. LEGEND-T2DM will identify all adult, patients with T2DM who newly initiate a traditionally second-line T2DM agent. Using an active comparator, new-user cohort design, LEGEND-T2DM will execute all pairwise class-versus-class and drug-versus-drug comparisons in each data source, producing extensive study diagnostics that assess reliability and generalisability through cohort balance and equipoise to examine the relative risk of cardiovascular and safety outcomes. The primary cardiovascular outcomes include a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events and a series of safety outcomes. The study will pursue data-driven, large-scale propensity adjustment for measured confounding, a large set of negative control outcome experiments to address unmeasured and systematic bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study ensures data safety through a federated analytic approach and follows research best practices, including prespecification and full disclosure of results. LEGEND-T2DM is dedicated to open science and transparency and will publicly share all analytic code from reproducible cohort definitions through turn-key software, enabling other research groups to leverage our methods, data and results to verify and extend our findings.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAdultHumansHypoglycemic AgentsReproducibility of ResultsSulfonylurea CompoundsDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsSulfonylurea CompoundsCardiologyDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYHealth informatics

Identifiers

PMID35680274
PMCPMC9185490
OpenAlexW4281735080

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.