ArticleBMJ open2022
Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEGEND-T2DM): a protocol for a series of multinational, real-world comparative cardiovascular effectiveness and safety studies.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Semaglutide and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: An Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics Network Study.Ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects Across Nine Glucose-Lowering Drug Classes in Type 2 Diabetes: Extension of the LEGEND-T2DM Network Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Observational
- Real-world performance of large-scale propensity score adjustment strategies: Matching, weighting, and stratification.Research square · 2026Article
- Comparative Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Antidiabetic Drug Associations With Heart Failure Outcomes: Real-World Evidence Study Using Electronic Health Records.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Real-world evidence for comparative safety of second-line antihyperglycemic agents in older adults with type 2 diabetes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A novel digital twin strategy to examine the implications of randomized clinical trials for real-world populations.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects Across Nine Glucose-Lowering Drug Classes in Type 2 Diabetes: Extension of the LEGEND-T2DM Network Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A pipeline for enabling path-specific causal fairness in observational health data.Proceedings of the ... Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · 2026Article
- Semaglutide and diabetic retinopathy: an OHDSI network study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025 · on this mapObservational
- The Role Of Drug Indication On Incidence Rate Heterogeneity: A Large-Scale, Systematic Evaluation Across An International Network Of Observational Databases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative cardiovascular outcomes and safety of hypoglycemic drug classes in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension: a multicenter cohort analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Assessing Covariate Balance With Small Sample Sizes.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Risk of Thyroid Tumors With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- Assessing Covariate Balance with Small Sample Sizes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Assessment of health conditions from patient electronic health record portals vs self-reported questionnaires: an analysis of the INSPIRE study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- A Generalized Tool to Assess Algorithmic Fairness in Disease Phenotype Definitions.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Harmonizing population health data into OMOP common data model: a demonstration using COVID-19 sero-surveillance data from Nairobi Urban Health and Demographic Surveillance System.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Multinational, Federated Analysis of LEGEND-T2DM.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Maximizing the Value of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence to Accelerate Healthcare Transformation in China: Summary of External Advisory Committee Meetings.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTherapeutic options for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have expanded over the last decade with the emergence of cardioprotective novel agents, but without such data for older drugs, leaving a critical gap in our understanding of the relative effects of T2DM agents on cardiovascular risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The large-scale evidence generations across a network of databases for T2DM (LEGEND-T2DM) initiative is a series of systematic, large-scale, multinational, real-world comparative cardiovascular effectiveness and safety studies of all four major second-line anti-hyperglycaemic agents, including sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and sulfonylureas. LEGEND-T2DM will leverage the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) community that provides access to a global network of administrative claims and electronic health record data sources, representing 190 million patients in the USA and about 50 million internationally. LEGEND-T2DM will identify all adult, patients with T2DM who newly initiate a traditionally second-line T2DM agent. Using an active comparator, new-user cohort design, LEGEND-T2DM will execute all pairwise class-versus-class and drug-versus-drug comparisons in each data source, producing extensive study diagnostics that assess reliability and generalisability through cohort balance and equipoise to examine the relative risk of cardiovascular and safety outcomes. The primary cardiovascular outcomes include a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events and a series of safety outcomes. The study will pursue data-driven, large-scale propensity adjustment for measured confounding, a large set of negative control outcome experiments to address unmeasured and systematic bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study ensures data safety through a federated analytic approach and follows research best practices, including prespecification and full disclosure of results. LEGEND-T2DM is dedicated to open science and transparency and will publicly share all analytic code from reproducible cohort definitions through turn-key software, enabling other research groups to leverage our methods, data and results to verify and extend our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.