Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35680773›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2022

CT angiography-based radiomics as a tool for carotid plaque characterization: a pilot study.

Savino Cilla, Gabriella Macchia, Jacopo Lenkowicz, Elena H Tran, Antonio Pierro, Lella Petrella, Mara Fanelli, Celestino Sardu, Alessia Re, Luca Boldrini and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quality assessment of radiomics models in carotid plaque: a systematic review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Radiomics in Lung Metastases: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Savino CillaMedical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 86100, Campobasso, Italy. savinocilla@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-350X
Gabriella MacchiaRadiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
Jacopo LenkowiczFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Elena H TranFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio PierroRadiology Department, "A. Cardarelli" Regional Hospital ASReM, Campobasso, Italy.
Lella PetrellaLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Mara FanelliLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Celestino SarduDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Alessia ReRadiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
Luca BoldriniRadiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luca IndovinaMedical Physics Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Carlo Maria De FilippoCardiac Surgery Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
Eugenio CaradonnaCardiac Surgery Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
Francesco DeodatoRadiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
Massimo MassettiCardiac Surgery Division, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo ValentiniRadiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Pietro ModugnoVascular Surgery Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesRadiomics is a quantitative method able to analyze a high-throughput extraction of minable imaging features. Herein, we aim to develop a CT angiography-based radiomics analysis and machine learning model for carotid plaques to discriminate vulnerable from no vulnerable plaques. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty consecutive patients with carotid atherosclerosis were enrolled in this pilot study. At surgery, a binary classification of plaques was adopted ("hard" vs "soft"). Feature extraction was performed using the R software package Moddicom. Pairwise feature interdependencies were evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. A univariate analysis was performed to assess the association between each feature and the plaque classification and chose top-ranked features. The feature predictive value was investigated using binary logistic regression. A stepwise backward elimination procedure was performed to minimize the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The final significant features were used to build the models for binary classification of carotid plaques, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and classification and regression tree analysis (CART). All models were cross-validated using fivefold cross validation. Class-specific accuracy, precision, recall and F-measure evaluation metrics were used to quantify classifier output quality.

resultsA total of 230 radiomics features were extracted from each plaque. Pairwise Spearman correlation between features reported a high level of correlations, with more than 80% correlating with at least one other feature at |ρ|> 0.8. After a stepwise backward elimination procedure, the entropy and volume features were found to be the most significantly associated with the two plaque groups (p < 0.001), with AUCs of 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. The best performance was registered by the SVM classifier with the RBF kernel, with accuracy, precision, recall and F-score equal to 86.7, 92.9, 81.3 and 86.7%, respectively. The CART classification tree model for the entropy and volume features model achieved 86.7% well-classified plaques and an AUC of 0.987.

conclusionThis pilot study highlighted the potential of CTA-based radiomics and machine learning to discriminate plaque composition. This new approach has the potential to provide a reliable method to improve risk stratification in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery DiseasesPlaque, AtheroscleroticAlgorithmsCarotid ArteriesComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansPilot ProjectsAngiographyCarotidPlaquesRadiomics

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.