Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684083›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Adherence to Diet and Meal Timing in a Randomized Controlled Feeding Study of Time-Restricted Feeding.

Beiwen Wu, Karen White, May Thu Thu Maw, Jeanne Charleston, Di Zhao, Eliseo Guallar, Lawrence J Appel, Jeanne M Clark, Nisa M Maruthur, Scott J Pilla

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Beiwen WuDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Karen WhiteDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
May Thu Thu MawDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7735-4550
Jeanne CharlestonDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Di ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Eliseo GuallarDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-9565
Lawrence J AppelDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0673-6823
Jeanne M ClarkDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Nisa M MaruthurDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Scott J PillaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Funding

American Heart Association 17SFRN33590069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence is critical in feeding studies to determine the efficacy of dietary interventions. This time-restricted intake of meals (TRIM) investigation was a controlled feeding study that randomized 41 participants to follow 12 weeks of time-restricted feeding (TRF) or a usual feeding pattern (UFP). Adherence was optimized through careful screening and participant orientation, flexibility in beverages and seasonings, and frequent contact between participants and staff. Adherence was measured daily using a self-administered diary form. We calculated the percentage of participant-days with perfect adherence to meal timing (ate all meals within their designated time window) and to food consumption (ate all study food and no non-study food). Adherence was compared between study arms, days of the week, and weeks of the study period using generalized estimating equations (GEE) regression. There was perfect adherence to meal timing on 87% of participant-days and to food consumption on 94% of participant-days, with no significant difference by arm. In UFP, but not TRF, participants had lower adherence to meal timing over the weekend (

Indexed as

DietMealsBeveragesEnergy IntakeFastingFeeding BehaviorHumanscompliancecontrolled feeding studydietary adherencediet monitoringnutrition interventionstime-restricted feeding

Identifiers

PMID35684083
PMCPMC9182754

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.