Evidence mapPaperPMID 35684094Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Efficacy and Safety of Nutrient Supplements for Glycaemic Control and Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes: An Umbrella Review and Hierarchical Evidence Synthesis.

Charmie Fong, Simon Alesi, Aya Mousa, Lisa J Moran, Gary Deed, Suzanne Grant, Kriscia Tapia, Carolyn Ee

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Ginseng and health outcomes: an umbrella review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charmie FongSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Simon AlesiMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1/43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1/43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4523
Lisa J MoranMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1/43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Gary DeedSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Suzanne GrantNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9491-203X
Kriscia TapiaNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3210-8046
Carolyn EeNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-9199
Monash University · AUWestern Sydney University · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Anonymous philanthropic donation to Western Sydney University P00026697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nutrient supplements are widely used for type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet evidence-based guidance for clinicians is lacking. Methods: We searched the four electronic databases from November 2015−December 2021. The most recent, most comprehensive, high-ranked systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and/or umbrella reviews of randomised controlled trials in adults with T2D were included. Data were extracted on study characteristics, aggregate outcome measures per group (glycaemic control, measures of insulin sensitivity and secretion), adverse events, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments. Quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2.0 (AMSTAR 2). Results: Twelve meta-analyses and one umbrella review were included. There was very low certainty evidence that chromium, Vitamin C, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (Ω-3 PUFAs) were superior to placebo for the primary outcome of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Mean Difference/MD −0.54, −0.54 and ES −0.27, respectively). Probiotics were superior to placebo for HbA1c (Weighted Mean Difference/WMD −0.43%). There was very low certainty evidence that Vitamin D was superior to placebo for lowering HbA1c in trials of <6 months (MD −0.17%). Magnesium, zinc, Vitamin C, probiotics, and polyphenols were superior to placebo for FBG. Vitamin D was superior to placebo for insulin resistance. Data on safety was limited. Conclusions: Future research should identify who may benefit from nutrient supplementation, safety, and optimal regimens and formulations.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Insulin ResistanceAdultAscorbic AcidDietary SupplementsGlycated HemoglobinGlycemic ControlHumansNutrientsSystematic Reviews as TopicVitamin DVitaminsAscorbic AcidGlycated HemoglobinNutrientsVitamin DVitaminsglycaemic controlinsulin resistancenutrientstype 2 diabetesumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID35684094
PMCPMC9182772
OpenAlexW4281975393

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.