Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685421›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2022

Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Women's Health and Family Planning.

Marguerite Duane, Joseph B Stanford, Christina A Porucznik, Pilar Vigil

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07248046 (Comparing Cervical Mucus, PDG, LH, and Basal Body Temperature Combinations for Ovulation and Luteal Phase Identification Using the Premom Smartphone App Versus User-Read Test Results), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07248046 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparing Cervical Mucus, PDG, LH, and Basal Body Temperature Combinations for Ovulation and Luteal Phase Identification Using the Premom Smartphone App Versus User-Read Test Results: A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBruyère Health Research Institute.Ran2026 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsFertility, Mobile Applications, Artifical Intelligence, Cervical MucusArmsPremom App-Assisted Fertility Tracking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The menstrual cycle is a vital sign across the lifespan.The Lancet. Obstetrics, gynaecology, & women's health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marguerite DuaneDepartment of Family Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Joseph B StanfordOffice of Cooperative Reproductive Health, Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Christina A PorucznikOffice of Cooperative Reproductive Health, Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Pilar VigilReproductive Health Research Institute (RHRI), New York, NY, United States.
University of Utah · USInstitute for Reproductive Health · USTeach For America · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) educate about reproductive health and enable tracking and interpretation of physical signs, such as cervical fluid secretions and basal body temperature, which reflect the hormonal changes women experience on a cyclical basis during the years of ovarian activity. Some methods measure relevant hormone levels directly. Most FABMs allow women to identify ovulation and track this "vital sign" of the menstrual or female reproductive cycle, through daily observations recorded on cycle charts (paper or electronic). Applications: Physicians can use the information from FABM charts to guide the diagnosis and management of medical conditions and to support or restore healthy function of the reproductive and endocrine systems, using a restorative reproductive medical (RRM) approach. FABMs can also be used by couples to achieve or avoid pregnancy and may be most effective when taught by a trained instructor. Challenges: Information about individual FABMs is rarely provided in medical education. Outdated information is widespread both in training programs and in the public sphere. Obtaining accurate information about FABMs is further complicated by the numerous period tracking or fertility apps available, because very few of these apps have evidence to support their effectiveness for identifying the fertile window, for achieving or preventing pregnancy. Conclusions: This article provides an overview of different types of FABMs with a published evidence base, apps and resources for learning and using FABMs, the role FABMs can play in medical evaluation and management, and the effectiveness of FABMs for family planning, both to achieve or to avoid pregnancy.

Indexed as

family planningfertility appsfertility awarenessinfertilitymenstrual cyclenatural family planningreproductive healthwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID35685421
PMCPMC9171018
OpenAlexW4285741866

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.