Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35686330›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2022

Identifying and treating resistant hypertension in PRECISION: A randomized long-term clinical trial with aprocitentan.

Parisa Danaietash, Pierre Verweij, Ji-Guang Wang, George Dresser, Ilkka Kantola, Mary Katherine Lawrence, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Markus Schlaich, Marc Bellet, PRECISION investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03541174 (Multi-center, Blinded, Randomized, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Study With Aprocitentan in Subjects With Resistant Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03541174 phase3completednot on this map

Multi-center, Blinded, Randomized, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Study With Aprocitentan in Subjects With Resistant Hypertension (RHT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Ran2018 to 2022Enrolled730ConditionsResistant HypertensionArmsAprocitentan 12.5 mg, Aprocitentan 25 mg, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current Knowledge About Aprocitentan in Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Endothelin antagonists for hypertension: has their time finally arrived?Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Resistant Hypertension: A Brief Review of Pathophysiology.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Hypertension and Heart Failure: From Pathophysiology to Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Parisa DanaietashIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland.
Pierre VerweijIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland.
Ji-Guang WangRui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-1524
George DresserLondon Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ilkka KantolaDivision of Medicine, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Mary Katherine LawrenceCarteret Medical Group, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA.
Krzysztof NarkiewiczMedical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Markus SchlaichDobney Hypertension Centre, Departments of Cardiology and Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital Unit - University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1765-0195
Marc BelletIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5364-6951
PRECISION investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design and baseline data of the PRECISION study, which evaluates the effect of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan on blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension (RHT) are presented. The study is a blinded, randomized, parallel-group Phase 3 study and its three-part design assesses the short-term and sustained long-term effects of aprocitentan on BP. Results are expected in 2022. Patients with uncontrolled BP (measured as unattended automated office BP) despite the use of three or more antihypertensive medications for at least 1 year were screened. They were switched to a single-tablet triple fixed combination antihypertensive therapy for at least 4 weeks before entering a single-blind placebo run-in period. The 4-week placebo run-in period further excluded placebo responders. The randomization period consisted of three sequential parts: (1) a 4-week double-blind part with aprocitentan 12.5 mg, 25 mg, or placebo (1:1:1 ratio); (2) a 32-week single-blind part with aprocitentan 25 mg; and (3) a 12-week randomized withdrawal part with aprocitentan 25 mg or placebo (1:1 ratio). The purpose was to demonstrate the BP lowering effect of aprocitentan in RHT (Part 1) and the persistence of this effect (Parts 2 and 3). Out of 1965 screened patients, 730 were randomized resulting in an overall inclusion failure rate of 62.8%. The most common reason for exclusion (44.4% of all screened patients) was failure to meet the BP inclusion criteria. These results underline the high proportion of pseudoresistant hypertension among patients referred for RHT.

Indexed as

HypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodHumansPyrimidinesSingle-Blind MethodSulfonamidesAntihypertensive AgentsaprocitentanPyrimidinesSulfonamidesaprocitentanblood pressureendothelin receptor antagonistpseudoresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID35686330
PMCPMC9278594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.