Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35686969›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Efficacy and Safety of Ripretinib in Chinese Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors as a Fourth- or Later-Line Therapy: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase II Study.

Jian Li, Shirong Cai, Yongjian Zhou, Jun Zhang, Ye Zhou, Hui Cao, Xin Wu, Yanhong Deng, Zhao Huang, Juan Dong and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06431451 (The Correlation Between Ripretinib Exposure and the Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06431451 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Correlation Between Ripretinib Exposure and the Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsGastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Precision Oncology in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jian LiPeking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Shirong CaiThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8315-9989
Yongjian ZhouFujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jun ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ye ZhouFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Hui CaoRenji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xin WuChinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanhong DengThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhao HuangR&D Department, Zai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Juan DongR&D Department, Zai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Lin ShenPeking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1660-1479
Fujian Medical University · CNPeking University · CNShanghai Chengtou (China) · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNRenji Hospital · CNThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis is a phase II multicenter, single-arm, open-label study assessing the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ripretinib in Chinese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) as a fourth- or later-line therapy. It was designed to show consistency with the phase III INVICTUS study. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with disease progression on (or intolerance to) prior imatinib, sunitinib, and at least one other drug were recruited to receive ripretinib 150 mg once daily continuously in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) based on independent radiologic review (IRR). Secondary efficacy endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) based on IRR and overall survival. Safety endpoints included the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE).

resultsBetween April 2020 and August 2020, 39 patients were enrolled. All were included in the safety analysis while 38 were included in the efficacy analysis. By primary data cut-off (February 26, 2021), the median PFS [90% confidence interval (CI)] was 7.2 (2.9-7.3) months; the lower bound of the 90% CI exceeded 1 month, fulfilling the standard of bridging success. The ORR (95% CI) based on IRR was 18.4% (7.7%-34.3%). Treatment-related treatment-emergent AEs (TRAE) were reported in 37 (94.9%) patients. The majority of TRAEs were of grade 1/2. A total of 6 patients (15.4%) experienced grade 3/4 TRAEs.

conclusionsThe results demonstrated that ripretinib can clinically improve the outcomes of Chinese patients with advanced GIST as a fourth- or later-line therapy. The efficacy, safety, and PK profiles of ripretinib are consistent with those in the global patient population.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsChinaHumansImatinib MesylateNaphthyridinesSunitinibUreaImatinib MesylateNaphthyridinesripretinibSunitinibUrea

Identifiers

PMID35686969
PMCPMC9662900
OpenAlexW4282923711

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.