Evidence mapPaperPMID 35693301Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Andrea Balla, Diletta Corallino, Silvia Quaresima, Livia Palmieri, Francesca Meoli, Ingrid Cordova Herencia, Alessandro M Paganini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Safety of indocyanine green use in bariatric and metabolic surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea BallaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Diletta CorallinoDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Silvia QuaresimaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Livia PalmieriDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesca MeoliDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ingrid Cordova HerenciaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro M PaganiniDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography (FA) is used for several purposes in general surgery, but its use in bariatric surgery is still debated. The objective of the present pilot study is to evaluate the intraoperative utility of ICG-FA during bariatric surgery in order to focus future research on a reliable tool to reduce the postoperative leak rate. Methods: Thirteen patients (4 men, 30.8%, 9 women, 69.2%) with median age of 52 years (confidence interval, CI, 95% 46.2-58.7 years) and preoperative median body mass index of 42.6 kg/m Results: Fom January 2021 to February 2022, six patients underwent LSG (46.2%), three patients underwent LGB (23.1%), and four patients underwent re-do LGB after LSG (30.8%). No adverse effects to ICG were observed. In 11 patients (84.6%) ICG-FA score was 5. During two laparoscopic re-do LGB, the vascular supply was not satisfactory (score 2/5) and the surgical strategy was changed based on ICG-FA (15.4%). At a median follow-up of five months postoperatively, leaks did not occur in any case. Conclusions: ICG-FA during bariatric surgery is a safe, feasible and promising procedure. It could help to reduce the ischemic leak rate, even if standardization of the procedure and objective fluorescence quantification are still missing. Further prospective studies with a larger sample of patients are required to draw definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

bariatric surgeryfluorescence angiography (FA)indocyanine green (ICG)laparoscopic gastric by-pass (LGB)laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)leakage

Identifiers

PMID35693301
PMCPMC9178117
OpenAlexW4281991694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.