Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694522›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

MegaSyn: Integrating Generative Molecular Design, Automated Analog Designer, and Synthetic Viability Prediction.

Fabio Urbina, Christopher T Lowden, J Christopher Culberson, Sean Ekins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Applications of artificial intelligence in drug discovery for neurological diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Preventing AI From Creating Biochemical Threats.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabio UrbinaCollaborations Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 840 Main Campus Drive, Lab 3510, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States.
Christopher T LowdenWorkflow Informatics Corporation, 9316 Bramden Court, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587, United States.
J Christopher CulbersonWorkflow Informatics Corporation, 9316 Bramden Court, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587, United States.
Sean EkinsCollaborations Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 840 Main Campus Drive, Lab 3510, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-5790

Funding

Centralized assay datasets for modelling support of small drug discovery organizationsR44GM122196 · NIGMS · COLLABORATIONS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
MegaTox for analyzing and visualizing data across different screening systemsR43ES031038 · NIEHS · COLLABORATIONS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2019 to 2020
$349k
MegaPredict for predicting natural product uses and their drug interactionsR43AT010585 · NCCIH · COLLABORATIONS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2019 to 2020
$225k
NCCIH NIH HHS R43 AT010585NIEHS NIH HHS R43 ES031038NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM122196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative machine learning models have become widely adopted in drug discovery and other fields to produce new molecules and explore molecular space, with the goal of discovering novel compounds with optimized properties. These generative models are frequently combined with transfer learning or scoring of the physicochemical properties to steer generative design, yet often, they are not capable of addressing a wide variety of potential problems, as well as converge into similar molecular space when combined with a scoring function for the desired properties. In addition, these generated compounds may not be synthetically feasible, reducing their capabilities and limiting their usefulness in real-world scenarios. Here, we introduce a suite of automated tools called MegaSyn representing three components: a new hill-climb algorithm, which makes use of SMILES-based recurrent neural network (RNN) generative models, analog generation software, and retrosynthetic analysis coupled with fragment analysis to score molecules for their synthetic feasibility. We show that by deconstructing the targeted molecules and focusing on substructures, combined with an ensemble of generative models, MegaSyn generally performs well for the specific tasks of generating new scaffolds as well as targeted analogs, which are likely synthesizable and druglike. We now describe the development, benchmarking, and testing of this suite of tools and propose how they might be used to optimize molecules or prioritize promising lead compounds using these RNN examples provided by multiple test case examples.

Identifiers

PMID35694522
PMCPMC9178760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.