Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35694667›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Construction of Novel Gene Signature-Based Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Combining Random Forest With Artificial Neural Network.

Yanze Wu, Hui Chen, Lei Li, Liuping Zhang, Kai Dai, Tong Wen, Jingtian Peng, Xiaoping Peng, Zeqi Zheng, Ting Jiang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yanze WuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Hui ChenDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Lei LiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Liuping ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Kai DaiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Tong WenDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jingtian PengDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiaoping PengDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zeqi ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Ting JiangDepartment of Hospital Infection Control, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wenjun XiongDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most common causes of mortality around the world. Early diagnosis of AMI contributes to improving prognosis. In our study, we aimed to construct a novel predictive model for the diagnosis of AMI using an artificial neural network (ANN), and we verified its diagnostic value Methods: We downloaded three publicly available datasets (training sets GSE48060, GSE60993, and GSE66360) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between 87 AMI and 78 control samples. We applied the random forest (RF) and ANN algorithms to further identify novel gene signatures and construct a model to predict the possibility of AMI. Besides, the diagnostic value of our model was further validated in the validation sets GSE61144 (7 AMI patients and 10 controls), GSE34198 (49 AMI patients and 48 controls), and GSE97320 (3 AMI patients and 3 controls). Results: A total of 71 DEGs were identified, of which 68 were upregulated and 3 were downregulated. Firstly, 11 key genes in 71 DEGs were screened with RF classifier for the classification of AMI and control samples. Then, we calculated the weight of each key gene using ANN. Furthermore, the diagnostic model was constructed and named neuralAMI, with significant predictive power (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.980). Finally, our model was validated with the independent datasets GSE61144 (AUC = 0.900), GSE34198 (AUC = 0.882), and GSE97320 (AUC = 1.00). Conclusion: Machine learning was used to develop a reliable predictive model for the diagnosis of AMI. The results of our study provide potential gene biomarkers for early disease screening.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionartificial neural networknovel gene signaturespredictive modelrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID35694667
PMCPMC9174464

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.