ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022
Multi-laboratory performance assessment of diffuse optics instruments: the BitMap exercise.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Noninvasive hemoglobin sensing and imaging: optical tools for disease diagnosis.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Pooled it
- Time-resolved laser speckle contrast imaging (TR-LSCI) of cerebral blood flow response to intracranial pressure elevation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Coherent modem-enabled spread-spectrum time-domain diffuse optical spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Optical phantoms for the characterization and validation of imaging and spectroscopy: a review.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Review
- Wearable frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy (FD-NIRS) system.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- In-vivo optical properties spectra across five body locations on ten subjects using time-domain diffuse optics.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Phantom for standardization in functional near-infrared spectroscopy, part 2: optical properties and Monte Carlo simulations.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Spectrally-resolved errors in absorption and reduced scattering due toBiomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Phantom for standardization in functional near-infrared spectroscopy, part 1: implementation and usage.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- Direct 3-D printing of complex optical phantoms using dynamic filament mixing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Challenging the skin pigmentation bias in tissue oximetry via time-domain near-infrared spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Tetherless miniaturized point detector device for monitoring cortical surface hemodynamics in mice.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- A compact time-domain diffuse optical tomography system for cortical neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Fabrication of complex optical phantoms using on-the-fly multi-filament mixing 3-D printing.Research square · 2024Article
- A personalized clinical assessment: multi-sensor approach for understanding musculoskeletal health in the frail population.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- Tutorial on methods for estimation of optical absorption and scattering properties of tissue.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Optical signatures of thermal damage on ex-vivo brain, lung and heart tissues using time-domain diffuse optical spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Two-layered blood-lipid phantom and method to determine absorption and oxygenation employing changes in moments of DTOFs.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Optical imaging and spectroscopy for the study of the human brain: status report.Neurophotonics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significanceMulti-laboratory initiatives are essential in performance assessment and standardization-crucial for bringing biophotonics to mature clinical use-to establish protocols and develop reference tissue phantoms that all will allow universal instrument comparison.
aimThe largest multi-laboratory comparison of performance assessment in near-infrared diffuse optics is presented, involving 28 instruments and 12 institutions on a total of eight experiments based on three consolidated protocols (BIP, MEDPHOT, and NEUROPT) as implemented on three kits of tissue phantoms. A total of 20 synthetic indicators were extracted from the dataset, some of them defined here anew. APPROACH: The exercise stems from the Innovative Training Network BitMap funded by the European Commission and expanded to include other European laboratories. A large variety of diffuse optics instruments were considered, based on different approaches (time domain/frequency domain/continuous wave), at various stages of maturity and designed for different applications (e.g., oximetry, spectroscopy, and imaging).
resultsThis study highlights a substantial difference in hardware performances (e.g., nine decades in responsivity, four decades in dark count rate, and one decade in temporal resolution). Agreement in the estimates of homogeneous optical properties was within 12% of the median value for half of the systems, with a temporal stability of <5 % over 1 h, and day-to-day reproducibility of <3 % . Other tests encompassed linearity, crosstalk, uncertainty, and detection of optical inhomogeneities.
conclusionsThis extensive multi-laboratory exercise provides a detailed assessment of near-infrared Diffuse optical instruments and can be used for reference grading. The dataset-available soon in an open data repository-can be evaluated in multiple ways, for instance, to compare different analysis tools or study the impact of hardware implementations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.