ArticleBMJ open2022
Emotional and physical experiences of people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the injection process in Germany: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing and assessing vision-related quality of life among patients discontinued treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Patient Experiences of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- Psychosocial determinants of anti-VEGF treatment adherence in AMD patients: optimization of one-stop intravitreal injection service model.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of different topical anesthetic methods for intravitreal injections: a randomized crossover study.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Qualitative Factors Impacting Patients and Clinicians Regarding Intravitreal Injections for Retinal Disorders: A Scoping Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Patient perspectives and barriers in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Denmark: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Piloting a forced-choice task to elicit treatment preferences in geographic atrophy.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn order to better understand the continued barriers to the provision of vascular endothelial inhibitor therapy, this study aims to investigate patients' experiences with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) in Germany during the injection process and how they deal with it. DESIGN AND
participantsThis analysis is part of the qualitative arm of a wider mixed-methods study. We recruited participants all over Germany via ophthalmologists, eye clinics, general practitioners, care bases and support groups between June 2018 and December 2020 and selected a subsample of study participants with nvAMD who were either undergoing or had previously undergone vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor therapy. We conducted narrative, semistructured, face-to-face interviews at the participants' homes, which were audio-recorded. The interviews were thematically analysed.
resultsTwenty-two participants were included in this analysis. Experiencing neovascular macular degeneration was dominated by the injection experience. Study participants perceived the treatment with vascular endothelial inhibitor injections as uncomfortable, and they described undergoing varying levels of anxiety during the whole injection process. After some years of receiving multiple injections, the pain and not experiencing any positive effects made participants with significant vision loss want to discontinue therapy. Furthermore, they narrated negative injection experiences in association with their interactions with medical staff and doctors.
conclusionAlthough time in the medical setting is limited, efficient and good doctor-patient relationships seem crucial for satisfying care experiences. A respectful and humane relationship may be one key to achieving treatment adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.