Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705659›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Development of secretome-based strategies to improve cell culture protocols in tissue engineering.

O Cases-Perera, C Blanco-Elices, J Chato-Astrain, C Miranda-Fernández, F Campos, P V Crespo, I Sánchez-Montesinos, M Alaminos, M A Martín-Piedra, I Garzón

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

O Cases-Perera *Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
C Blanco-Elices *Doctoral Program in Biomedicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
J Chato-AstrainDepartment of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación 11, 18016, Granada, Spain.
C Miranda-FernándezDepartment of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación 11, 18016, Granada, Spain.
F CamposDepartment of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación 11, 18016, Granada, Spain.
P V CrespoDepartment of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación 11, 18016, Granada, Spain.
I Sánchez-MontesinosInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
M AlaminosDepartment of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación 11, 18016, Granada, Spain. malaminos@ugr.es.
M A Martín-PiedraDepartment of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación 11, 18016, Granada, Spain. mmartin@ugr.es.
I GarzónDepartment of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Avenida de la Investigación 11, 18016, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in skin tissue engineering have promoted the development of artificial skin substitutes to treat large burns and other major skin loss conditions. However, one of the main drawbacks to bioengineered skin is the need to obtain a large amount of viable epithelial cells in short periods of time, making the skin biofabrication process challenging and slow. Enhancing skin epithelial cell cultures by using mesenchymal stem cells secretome can favor the scalability of manufacturing processes for bioengineered skin. The effects of three different types of secretome derived from human mesenchymal stem cells, e.g. hADSC-s (adipose cells), hDPSC-s (dental pulp) and hWJSC-s (umbilical cord), were evaluated on cultured skin epithelial cells during 24, 48, 72 and 120 h to determine the potential of this product to enhance cell proliferation and improve biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering. Then, secretomes were applied in vivo in preliminary analyses carried out on Wistar rats. Results showed that the use of secretomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells enhanced currently available cell culture protocols. Secretome was associated with increased viability, proliferation and migration of human skin epithelial cells, with hDPSC-s and hWJSC-s yielding greater inductive effects than hADSC-s. Animals treated with hWJSC-s and especially, hDPSC-s tended to show enhanced wound healing in vivo with no detectable side effects. Mesenchymal stem cells derived secretomes could be considered as a promising approach to cell-free therapy able to improve skin wound healing and regeneration.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsTissue EngineeringAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationRatsRats, WistarSecretome

Identifiers

PMID35705659
PMCPMC9200715
OpenAlexW4282960847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.