Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706047›Full record

SynthesisGenome medicine2022

Integrated genomic analyses of acral and mucosal melanomas nominate novel driver genes.

Meng Wang, Ishani Banik, A Hunter Shain, Iwei Yeh, Boris C Bastian

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genome medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Gene fusions in melanocytic lesions: an updated comprehensive review.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. MYC as a key target for melanoma therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The Roles of PTEN in Melanoma Suppression.Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2025
    Review
  12. Ancestry and somatic profile predict acral melanoma origin and prognosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Landscape Deciphers Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Subtypes of Acral and Mucosal Melanomas.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng WangDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3209-1026
Ishani BanikDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
A Hunter ShainDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Iwei YehDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. iwei.yeh@ucsf.edu.
Boris C BastianDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. boris.bastian@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Molecular and immunologic evolution of melanomas from pre-neoplastic lesionsR35CA220481 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASTIAN, BORIS C. · 2017 to 2023
$6.3M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA220481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcral and mucosal melanomas are aggressive subtypes of melanoma, which have a significantly lower burden of somatic mutations than cutaneous melanomas, but more frequent copy number variations, focused gene amplifications, and structural alterations. The landscapes of their genomic alterations remain to be fully characterized.

methodsWe compiled sequencing data of 240 human acral and mucosal melanoma samples from 11 previously published studies and applied a uniform pipeline to call tumor cell content, ploidy, somatic and germline mutations, as well as CNVs, LOH, and SVs. We identified genes that are significantly mutated or recurrently affected by CNVs and implicated in oncogenesis. We further examined the difference in the frequency of recurrent pathogenic alterations between the two melanoma subtypes, correlation between pathogenic alterations, and their association with clinical features.

resultsWe nominated PTPRJ, mutated and homozygously deleted in 3.8% (9/240) and 0.8% (2/240) of samples, respectively, as a probable tumor suppressor gene, and FER and SKP2, amplified in 3.8% and 11.7% of samples, respectively, as probable oncogenes. We further identified a long tail of infrequent pathogenic alterations, involving genes such as CIC and LZTR1. Pathogenic germline mutations were observed on MITF, PTEN, ATM, and PRKN. We found BRAF V600E mutations in acral melanomas with fewer structural variations, suggesting that they are distinct and related to cutaneous melanomas. Amplifications of PAK1 and GAB2 were more commonly observed in acral melanomas, whereas SF3B1 R625 codon mutations were unique to mucosal melanomas (12.9%). Amplifications at 11q13-14 were frequently accompanied by fusion to a region on chromosome 6q12, revealing a recurrent novel structural rearrangement whose role remains to be elucidated.

conclusionsOur meta-analysis expands the catalog of driver mutations in acral and mucosal melanomas, sheds new light on their pathogenesis and broadens the catalog of therapeutic targets for these difficult-to-treat cancers.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDNA Copy Number VariationsGenomicsHumansMutationTranscription FactorsLZTR1 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID35706047
PMCPMC9202124
OpenAlexW4282975358

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.