Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706800›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Analysis of the key prognostic genes and potential traditional Chinese medicine therapeutic targets in glioblastoma based on bioinformatics and network pharmacology methods.

Zhiyu Xia, Peng Gao, Yu Chen, Lei Shu, Lei Ye, Hongwei Cheng, Xingliang Dai, Yangchun Hu, Zhongyong Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Key ingredients inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiyu Xia *Department of Clinical Medicine, the First Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Peng Gao *Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yu ChenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, the First Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Lei ShuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, the First Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Lei YeDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hongwei ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xingliang DaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yangchun HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zhongyong WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To analyze the key prognostic genes and potential traditional Chinese medicine targets in glioblastoma (GBM) by bioinformatics and network pharmacology. Methods: GBM datasets were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to clarify the differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) in the carcinoma and paracancerous tissues. The molecular functions (MF) and signaling pathways of enriched DEGs were analyzed by the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses. The STRING database and Cytoscape software were used to construct the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and screen hub genes to focus on genes with greater clinical significance. The transcription expression and prognosis of hub genes were analyzed using the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA 2) database. The important compounds and target molecules were obtained via the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database (TCMSP) database. We identified the active ingredients by setting the property values of pharmacokinetic attribute values. We constructed the network of "Chinese medicine ingredients-DEGs target" and screened out the target genes and active ingredients with high correlation scores. Finally, molecular docking verification was carried out using AutoDock Tools and PyMOL. Results: We obtained 271 DEGs, including 212 up-regulated genes and 59 down-regulated genes and screened ten hub genes. GO and KEGG analyses suggested that the hub genes were mainly involved in the following biological processes: the cell cycle, cell division, and cell adhesion, as well as extracellular matrix adhesion-related pathways, the p53 signaling pathways, and cadherin binding involved in cell-cell adhesion. We established the interaction network between the components and DEGs to screen out the traditional Chinese medicine active component (luteolin) and target genes (BIRC5 and CCNB1) for the treatment of GBM. The molecular docking results showed that the bindings of protein receptors, BIRC5 and CCNB1, with the compound ligand, luteolin, were stable and formed by hydrogen bonding interaction. Conclusions: In this study, we determined that luteolin potentially inhibits glioblastoma proliferation and migration through key target genes, BIRC5 and CCNB1, via bioinformatics and network pharmacology analysis, and affects the prognosis of GBM patients, providing new ideas for clinical targeted therapy and new drug development.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsdifferentially-expressed genes (DEGs)Glioblastoma (GBM)network pharmacologytraditional Chinese medicine target

Identifiers

PMID35706800
PMCPMC9189201
OpenAlexW4283012171

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.