Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707911›Full record

ReviewMedicinal research reviews2022

Biofabrication approaches and regulatory framework of metastatic tumor-on-a-chip models for precision oncology.

Daniel Nieto, Gema Jiménez, Lorenzo Moroni, Elena López-Ruiz, Patricia Gálvez-Martín, Juan Antonio Marchal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicinal research reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel NietoComplex Tissue Regeneration Department, MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, University of Maastricht, Universiteitssingel, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0919-5110
Gema JiménezCenter for Biomedical Research (CIBM)/Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9803-879X
Lorenzo MoroniComplex Tissue Regeneration Department, MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, University of Maastricht, Universiteitssingel, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-6025
Elena López-RuizCenter for Biomedical Research (CIBM)/Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7863-0497
Patricia Gálvez-MartínR&D Human Health, Bioibérica S.A.U, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-8560
Juan Antonio MarchalCenter for Biomedical Research (CIBM)/Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-8261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) together with the development of the metastatic process are the main reasons for the failure of conventional anticancer treatment. In recent years, there is an increasing need to advance toward advanced in vitro models of cancer mimicking TME and simulating metastasis to understand the associated mechanisms that are still unknown, and to be able to develop personalized therapy. In this review, the commonly used alternatives and latest advances in biofabrication of tumor-on-chips, which allow the generation of the most sophisticated and optimized models for recapitulating the tumor process, are presented. In addition, the advances that have allowed these new models in the area of metastasis, cancer stem cells, and angiogenesis are summarized, as well as the recent integration of multiorgan-on-a-chip systems to recapitulate natural metastasis and pharmacological screening against it. We also analyze, for the first time in the literature, the normative and regulatory framework in which these models could potentially be found, as well as the requirements and processes that must be fulfilled to be commercially implemented as in vitro study model. Moreover, we are focused on the possible regulatory pathways for their clinical application in precision medicine and decision making through the generation of personalized models with patient samples. In conclusion, this review highlights the synergistic combination of three-dimensional bioprinting systems with the novel tumor/metastasis/multiorgan-on-a-chip systems to generate models for both basic research and clinical applications to have devices useful for personalized oncology.

Indexed as

BioprintingNeoplasmsHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesPrecision MedicineTumor Microenvironment3D bioprintingbiofabricationlab-on-a-chipmetastasispersonalized medicineprecision oncologyregulatory framework

Identifiers

PMID35707911
PMCPMC9545141

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.